logan1_2000
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2002
- Messages
- 1,368
Very true in pointing out that eventually the ship will be returning to the U.S. from a foreign port--otherwise there would be a Jones Act problem if the itinerary was entirely U.S.--not to mention a boring itinerary--but reflect for a minute on customs and immigation back at Port Canaveral...the hall monitor at my junior high was more thorough...and it is absolutely true that this process is an example of bureaucracy. I agree completely that the immigration officials expect to find nothing of note and don't find any surprises. Might be nice to think that the law could allow a waiver for a ship whose passengers have already gone through a process, such as DCL's or the other major cruise lines', that has been certified by INS. And some aspects of U.S. law do allow the private sector to certify their processes and then become self-inspecting. But the second such a law would be passed, in this post 9/11 world, either someone who didn't like the U.S. would start plotting, or otherwise so many people would become fearful that such a plot was hatching, that there would be a backlash against making our immigration safeguards into a Mickey Mouse operation...sorry, the line was there, had to go for it.
Me? I'm waking up at 6 and reporting down there w/ DW and DS in whatever jammies we slept in (sadly shows how little excitement there is in my middle aged life that I already know there won't be any thing that needs covering up) and a couple of deck 9 diet cokes in my hands. Make up for it by sleeping in the next day.
Me? I'm waking up at 6 and reporting down there w/ DW and DS in whatever jammies we slept in (sadly shows how little excitement there is in my middle aged life that I already know there won't be any thing that needs covering up) and a couple of deck 9 diet cokes in my hands. Make up for it by sleeping in the next day.



