About Disney "buying" a pier in SF, something like that would most likely get the attention of the media, so I doubt that this is so. Also the cruiselines don't generally actually own the piers/terminals. They pay rent to the various port authorities. To get "upgrades" the agree to pay X amount of of $'s for X years. They then strongly influence design.
For example Carnival recently reached an agreement with the NY/NJ port authority to in essence build a whole new cruise ship terminal in Brooklyn. To do this Carnival has pledged they there will be x number of passengers going through the terminal each year for a certain number of years. The port authority gets a "cut" of each passenger's fare to pay for the this new terminal
Also, while the Disney family is involved in Napa, they really don't have anything to do with Disney Corporate in regards to things like this, unless Roy Jr's company provided financing for the redevelopment of piers for non-cruise type purposes.
For example Carnival recently reached an agreement with the NY/NJ port authority to in essence build a whole new cruise ship terminal in Brooklyn. To do this Carnival has pledged they there will be x number of passengers going through the terminal each year for a certain number of years. The port authority gets a "cut" of each passenger's fare to pay for the this new terminal
Also, while the Disney family is involved in Napa, they really don't have anything to do with Disney Corporate in regards to things like this, unless Roy Jr's company provided financing for the redevelopment of piers for non-cruise type purposes.



