2 things that bugged me:
1. a big part of the story line with Lord John involved characters from the 'side novels' about him. I had thought they were stand alone stories to fill out his character. He's not my favorite character and I resent having to read those other books to figure out what's going on in Echo.
2. The ending - while the previous books are obviously part of the ongoing story, they come to a logical ending and feel like you are bringing current events to a close. This book - nope, does not have that feeling. Feels like the end of a chapter, not the end of a book. That's a big cliffhanger to leave us with for 3 or 4 years until the next book comes out.
I agree-I hope she has a good start on the next book. When they drag out like this people tend to lose interest, kind of like the Jean Auel Clan of the Cave Bear books. It has been over 20 years since she started writing the series and STILL has one more book to write (come on already-I started reading these when I was in high school and now I have KIDS in high school).
Can somebody list the "side novels" for me and tell me what order they should be read in? I've just started rereading Outlander and am going to read the whole series so I might as well read the side ones too. Never read those before so I don't even know who they're about.2 things that bugged me:
1. a big part of the story line with Lord John involved characters from the 'side novels' about him. I had thought they were stand alone stories to fill out his character. He's not my favorite character and I resent having to read those other books to figure out what's going on in Echo.
2. The ending - while the previous books are obviously part of the ongoing story, they come to a logical ending and feel like you are bringing current events to a close. This book - nope, does not have that feeling. Feels like the end of a chapter, not the end of a book. That's a big cliffhanger to leave us with for 3 or 4 years until the next book comes out.
I finished it about a week ago. I was totally disappointed - and I was a HUGE fan of the series up to now.
I thought the ending was rushed and criminally cropped to get to a stopping point that seemed arbitrary.
SPOILERS!!!! Don't read any further if you don't want to know!
I was totally ticked that she devoted PAGES to Claire amputating Jamie's finger, but the fact that he's lost at sea and considered dead, and then she becomes a spy and is in danger of being arrested and marries Lord John all happens in less than 4 pages? Give me a break! I knew immediately that Jamie was dead at all, because if he was, we'd be seeing Claire's heartbreak and anguish. It didn't ring true to me at all.
The cliffhanger with Jem lost in the mine was just horrible - I couldn't believe they didn't wrap that up.
The whole thing needed some editing and polishing and I can't believe they published it that way. I couldn't spring for the book this month due to back to school expenses (I own the rest of the series) and got it from the library. Now I'm glad I didn't buy it and don't see myself buying it in the future!
I couldn't figure that out either, how could they (roger and bree) have not just read all the letters as soon as they got ahold of them? Who would have that much restraint?
And what was up with the guy from the 1700's that comes forward? When has that happened before? I was very confused.