rie'smom said:Plagerism is plagerism no matter what pretty cover anyone puts on it.
You sure told them! Hmmm, a society in which one can own historical facts - interesting conceptrie'smom said:Plagerism is plagerism no matter what pretty cover anyone puts on it.
DISUNC said:I find this sad, because it simply isn't true! As a Catholic, it always bothered me when the church TOLD me what to watch or read! As a adult I truly believe I can make my own decisions. As a American I ALWAYS question any Authoritative body. It is not only our right, but our responsibility!
I understand the Churches stand, and that is fine for them. However, I do believe you should satisfy your curiosity, this book is VERY ENTERTAINING! If you do read it and find anything blasphemous, just put it down.
sodaseller said:You may not wish to watch it. Heck, it may be a mediocre movie. But please don't rely on EWTN. You will be led into error for sure if you do
You certainly should not rely on "the DaVinci Code" as accurate history. It is not. It is fiction
DisneyGerry said:
I havent seen or read one good thing about this movie/ book from any respectable Bible-fearing Christian. I do think EWTN is an important voice for Catholics as well as all Christians.
DisneyGerry said:I do think EWTN is an important voice for the Church. But, not just EWTN but whole Catholic Church as well as the entire Christian Church should be against this movie/ book.
If people are so interested in learning more about Jesus read the Gospel.
sodaseller said:You sure told them! Hmmm, a society in which one can own historical facts - interesting concept
Actually I have seen Dan Brown on TV say it is a fiction book, but much of what is in there is fact. So some who hear that start to "look" for the facts and then make some of the fiction into fact in their minds. This is where it becomes dangerous. I know enough about the Church and history to know where the facts end and fiction begins. But some do not.crcormier said:Why should the church be against a work of fiction that claims to be fiction? There are no claims that this book is an historical account about Jesus.
DisneyGerry said:I do think EWTN is an important voice for the Church. But, not just EWTN but whole Catholic Church as well as the entire Christian Church should be against this movie/ book.
If people are so interested in learning more about Jesus read the Gospel.
IT IS FICTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! not gospel of any sort. Why do people find that so hard to grasp?!?!?!? Why should the church be against a book that is fiction? Is faith so fragile that even fiction works threaten them? I honestly don't get this argument at all.DisneyGerry said:I do think EWTN is an important voice for the Church. But, not just EWTN but whole Catholic Church as well as the entire Christian Church should be against this movie/ book.
If people are so interested in learning more about Jesus read the Gospel.
DISUNC said:Hey somebody else wrote this on another board!![]()
DisneyGerry said:I do think EWTN is an important voice for the Church. But, not just EWTN but whole Catholic Church as well as the entire Christian Church should be against this movie/ book.
If people are so interested in learning more about Jesus read the Gospel.
roberrl187 said:Tonight I will look to see if Angels and Deamons is available for my ipod.
DisneyGerry said:A lot of stuff we do is Very Entertaining but that doesnt make it right.]
DisneyGerry said:I havent seen or read one good thing about this movie/ book from any respectable Bible-fearing Christian. I do think EWTN is an important voice for Catholics as well as all Christians.