We have never stayed at AKL, and are considering it.. my question, is it worth it to pay extra for the savanna view, as in, do you always see animals at some point, or is it hit or miss/not really a lot of animals? Thx
We stayed in a standard room at Jambo House last April, and requested a room on the Kudu Trail. In online check-in, it was described as "near paddock". We had a great animal view in that standard room: we saw giraffe every day just yards from our balcony. Other animals, too, but the giraffe were the most memorable.
The reason these rooms on the Kudu Trail are standard view is they don't offer sweeping views of the savanna. But we still had plenty of animals to look at, 24/7. There was a watering hole & feeding station outside, which ensured that animals were always there. It was extraordinary.
I'd personally never pay the steep savanna upgrade cost after that experience. I'd just check my room location at check-in, to see if it's on the Kudu Trail, and ask if they could move me if it isn't. That does entail the risk that no Kudu Trail rooms would be available and you'd get no view of animals, though. Keep in mind, however, that even some people in savanna rooms complain that animals were rarely outside when they looked out (they were probably feeding/drinking next to our balcony, lol), or that trees obscured much of their view. So there is always some risk no matter what type of room you book. Avoid pool view, which never has animal views.
You'll have to choose the combination of cost and risk of no animal view, that works for you. For me, a standard room (much less expensive) that could possibly have an animal view is what I prefer.