I share your quandary regarding imposition of our Western bias.
I cannot imagine that anyone could ever make enough money in their life so as to provide same as renumeration for inflicting blindness and disfigurement, not to mention the pain and suffering applicable at several stages of the victim's experience (the actual attack, for starters!) And even if there was such an amount of money and someone could make that much, doesn't that tie justice to affluence in a manner inconsistent with practically any society's standards? Is there any society or belief system that declares that acceptable? Don't get me wrong; there is a place for civil lawsuits. However, that's between the victim and the attacker. I don't believe that anyone would consider it acceptable for society to routinely dispense justice with regard to assaults on society's laws (i.e., criminal justice) biased by affluence (of either accused or victim, for that matter). "Equal justice under the law," is how American standards describe it, but is that just an Western standard?