Sooo....
Has anyone else besides ME seen the
new STICKY on the CRUISE MEET forum area? I was the 14th (or 15th) viewer and posted the 1st reply.
It addresses how there is a nw a
NEW INFRACTION WARNING SYSTEM going in place. In brief - it seems that now when someone violates any conduct or TOS guidelines, or does anything that is deemed inappropriate by a moderator - they will get #1) a warning point(s) of some kind, #2) the warning point(s) assignment automatically generates a viewable thread in a specific area... so it seems as if anyone might view the progression of conversation on that infraction; and #3) Folks recieving an infraction point will have an opportunity to defend themselves - possibly contribute supportive 2nd party observations.
These infraction threads appear to be something akin to
"Traffic Court". How charming.
Frankly I like the idea as ocassionally I've seen just plain "mean" and "improper" venting elsewhere on the DIS. Sometimes the nicest people have been victimized from what I have seen. For example, once I know of someone who was recovering from surgery and on their anniversery was send a scathing PM! Now, if that was not premeditated and infantile - I don't know what wouldn't be.
Over time I privately counseled everyone to stay cool - and this would go away - then I sort of snapped and (uncharactisitcly) I posted publicly that something by "so and so" had been done that was vile and wrong - and we needed an aploogy from them... pronto. I did not specify the details publicly nor did I contribute any language that was foul. I did go on to say that the growing silence might be an admission of guilt... I was in fact quite annoyed over the lack of justice in this matter - so I took it upon myself to risk the public "heat".
Naturally, everyone was surprised that I spoke out at all after counseling so many to just stay cool and silent. AND... I drew a number of polite admonishments publicly for perpetuating any *******... and I drew an equal number of complements for essentially being a rightous loud mouth. Folks commented that they felt my judgement would not be expected to be unfounded - as only a few had seen the actual violating PM.
A monitor came by to glance at all the details and ... edited nothing... asking the injured party for input. The guilty party edited their (see, no gender revealed) public postings and left. They had very little to say publicly anyways.
My point - is now we have given the moderators a far better (more refined) tool and mechanism for dealing with questionable matters that probably detract from our community.
I applaud the changes... and now I'm beginning to wonder ...
how many infraction points can "I" get before my travel insurance rates jump? <LOL> I'm in California... will THAT affect my rates as well? So.... does anyone think I should PM the Insurance Commissionor to have him check whether this point system is legal or maybe an improper form of red lining <chuckles?>....
who shall be the watch dog over the watch dogs? Hmmm... why ME of course! <LOL>
