Morning
Check your cable listing for A&E. They are doing a Biography now on Johnny Depp. I looks like it is 2 hours. Hope you can catch it.............
I'm going back into bed
Oh man, why'd I have to miss that!
No he didn't and that is what I too am holding on to.
What he did say was that the storylines had all been tied up and all the characters had been taken to their end for these stories.
If they do any more it could be based on CJS and other new characters because I don't think that they other actors want to continue. (IMHO only.)
IMHO CJS hasn't been "taken to their end" -maybe for this story but many more stories could come along. Some of the others might be all tied up and taken to their end (and then some.... can't say more for those that haven't seen it yet!) but not CJS!
Mark my word on this ....doesnt matter what Jerry B says ...Pirates will be back .....Jerry B also said that Teague (Kieth Richards ) wasnt his father , but when you see the movie ...well you know ....So in true Disney fashion it will be back with CJS ..as far as th others , well lets just wait and see ...Like I said nothing about a new Pirates till 09 or 10 or 11 for that matter , but in true disney form Pirates will be back ...
I just hope you are right. hope hope hope (and pixie dust)
#2) Since our younger daughter was born close to the cutoff date for entry into K-school (we induced so we would have the option!).... my spouse has the opinion that the younger one should be put into school the 1st year she can. IE... this will make her among the YOUNGEST kids in her class. She already will be among the most petite - even though she seems to be BIGGER than her older sibling at the same age. AND, this is in spite of the opinion that she currently is trailing her older sibling socially at the same age. We have just recently obtained an academic study/discussion citing MANY considerations and variables on "academic redshirting" (or holding back a student for academic considerations).... and the article was actually quite NEUTRAL in its' findings. Not what I expected. So... if we hold her she will be among the more "experienced" and "prepared" girls in her cohort. She could be among the first able to drive, physically/emotionally develope (sports?), and possibly exhibit stronger leadership qualities. Then - the ADVANTAGES of putting her in EARLY are that she would be the among the youngest - and hence the advantage becomes being among the LAST to Drive, potentially among the LAST to develope physically/emotionally - hence among the last to DATE?; and she would have to push a little more to be a young leader among her cohort. Any opinions other than that her Dad is agonizing like Doctor Frankstein over the weather!?
I agree with what some other said about this. It really depends on the child and only you would know what you think is best for her. It's easy to second guess yourself but it's good that you're thinking about it HARD. You do need to think about it and weigh the pros and cons that you think she'd have for her personality/etc. and decide which way would be better.
I have had both extremes with my kids. My first 2 turned the next age up one early in the school year and one midway thru- therefore they started K when they were almost 6 and 1st grade when they were almost 7 (and so on). I had no choice in the matter (ie: I couldn't start them early- they had to be 5 before k and 6 before starting 1st grade) but they have excelled in many ways and a part of that might be that they are slightly older when starting those grades. However I have found practically half (if not more than that) of the kids are all the same way.. MOST of them have a birthday early on in the year or midway thru and they all had to wait to start school just as my older two did.
Now with my youngest- her birthday wasn't "right" before school started- like a day before or something like that- but close enough. Her birthday is June 16th and at that time school was starting the first week in August here- so she was only "of age" to start K, 1st grade about 6wks before school started. (school is starting later nowadays- last year it was mid august and next year it's Aug 27th! so that changes too apparently).
Anyway, I had to weigh the pros and cons. She was also a small child- and although she's grown a lot in the past 2yrs she's still on the smaller side. However that's really a non-issue because as I have seen with my older two AND with her- there is such a huge range of sizes of children the same age. I have seen kids closer to her age (on the young side for that grade) that you wouldn't believe they were in the same grade because they are SO tall- and likewise I have seen children who were almost a year older than her and were actually smaller than her! It's sometimes comical to watch like their plays and/or award ceremonies- such a wide range of height and it's hard to believe they are all in the same grade. So age really doesn't always help keep them the same "height" as others- it still varies widely regardless.
However, she was the 3rd child... and just as the books probably say- while she may have been a little spoiled by having elder siblings do things for her/help her do things/etc. she also learned a lot from them at a younger age than she would have had she been a first born or only child. All my kids talked early (and often- are you surprised? LOL) but each one progressively more advanced verbally, physically, etc. I imagine that's from having older siblings to learn from.
For Rita we also had to "consider" other aspects of this decision. She is totally different than my other two -or atleast was- in respect to her academic motivation. My older two wanted to learn to read early, THRIVED on being able to show their abilities and things they learned/etc. academically even before school started. While my little Rita was more artistically inclined and would much rather spend her time drawing, making music with anything she could get her hands on, singing, acting, etc. than learning her ABC's, wanting to read (why bother when so many people will just read to her? LOL), etc. And even things she did learn she kept that information to herself- apparently. She would learn things (pre-school years) and was not the least bit interested in sharing that fact with you. It was one of my worries when she started K- because I honestly thought she was going to have to learn a LOT in K. But she surprised me.. she did a complete turn-around on that aspect with her teacher. She just finished 1st grade so I can remember K vividly and how surprised I was those first few months... when the teacher would tell me how much she already knew when she started K, how well she did with the testing they do at the beginning of the year to see where everyone is "at" and such. Apparently she had learned quite a bit -just wasn't motivated or interested in telling us or showing us that she'd learned so much.
But anyway, that was something we considered- and we decided to just let her go to K and if she was having trouble keeping up academically and/or any other issues arised due to her age, size, etc. that we'd just hold her back in K. The worst that would happen would be that she'd have that extra year of K (because remember she didn't really want to learn anything from us- so it's not like WE could have spent that year with her at home making sure she was well prepared for K.... atleast we thought she wasn't wanting to learn- she was learning alright, she just didn't care to share that information with anyone else. So the opposite of my older two over-achievers, mega-competitors, shows offs at times... etc. LOL) But she went into K and showed that she was perfectly capable and has done well in 1st grade as well.
Now I will say she may not be doing QUITE as good as the other two did at that age. My older two didn't ever even have any B's (none for Robert- Ruby didn't have a B until 6th grade, one) and she's had a B here or there pretty much each 6wks. But a B is not like failing or anything... it's still perfectly acceptable (and we make sure not to compare her to them. This may not be just due to her age but more likely just to her own personality. She's for sure just as bright as they are, she's just not academically motivated/inclined as they are- as I mentioned previously. She has changed in some respects such as quickly wanted to learn to read and such- but she's just different. For instance the B's meant nothing to her- my son would think the world came crashing to an end- or might as well have as far as he's concerned- if he got a B... *sigh*)
But socially- that was not a concern for us. She's always been most outgoing, etc. She's no wallflower... she was quickly one of the most popular, most liked, and yes most talkative (that's the only behavior issue she's had at school- again are you surprised? LOL) of both her classes so far each year. (more so, WAY more so, than her older siblings actually. My oldest was always a tomboy and somewhat shy at school or in large groups of people... my son is like someone else mentioned- highly intelligent but not that great socially with others. He actually tests on the autism spectrum: Aspergers... issues with nonverbal communication doesn't make you a lot of friends or exactly give you the social skills most desired at his age. He tested pretty much off the charts on IQ though. He says he wants to be an astronaut when he grows up and I can totally see him in some science type career- of the type where there is not a lot of social interaction involved in that career. totally can see that happening. He could totally carry a conversation with an intelligent adult as if he was an intelligent educated adult- and he's only 9. But if they weren't speaking and used any nonverbal communication- he's lost.)
My youngest may be "smaller" than some (but still bigger than some) and she may not make the highest grades in the class- but she's NOT behind socially in any way. If anything she is miles ahead of most of them in some ways- again probably because she was at home all those years with a sibling 2.5yrs old and a sibling 6.5yrs older. In other words she was totally used to being around older "kids" already, so it was no big deal for her to be in a class where some of the kids were almost a year older than her- and your daughter probably is too- atleast to some degree... because of her older sister.
Just consider all aspects of this and you know your daughter best... but personally my opinion on the matter is primarily based on my experiences with my kids and I finally just decided why not? What's the worst that could happen? I'd have just had her do K over again if I felt there were reasons that being one of the youngest in class wasn't working out well. But that didn't happen.. and now she's going into 2nd grade and doing great.

Good luck with the decision- it is a tough one you agonize over but I'm sure you'll figure out what's best for her.
From Post 1
Elizabeth Swan - POTC I GOLD dress
Elizabeth Swan- POTC I Robe -
Elizabeth Swan- POTC I Plum Dress -
Elizabeth Swan - POTC I Rum Island Dress -
Elizabeth Swan - POTC I Peach Gown -
Elizabeth Swan - POTC I British Uniform -
Elizabeth Swan - DMC Wedding Gown -
Elizabeth Swan - DMC Pirate -
Elizabeth Swan - AWE Asian Costume -
We need to add:
Elizabeth Swan - AWE Commando Robe -
LOL!!!!!!!