5 Meerkats Destroyed because of parent negligence!

golfgal

DIS Cast Member<br><font color=green>When did vacu
Joined
Nov 27, 2004
Messages
33,056
This makes me mad. Why didn't the parents stop their child from reaching into the exhibit. These are WILD animals no matter what Disney says. Now no one else can see these animals because some parents weren't paying attention to their child.


Rabies tests on zoo's meerkats come back negative

A family of five Minnesota Zoo meerkats destroyed after a girl was bitten did not have rabies after all, a zoo official said today.
Bob Von Sternberg and Chao Xoing, Star Tribune

A family of five Minnesota Zoo meerkats destroyed after a girl was bitten did not have rabies after all, a zoo official said today.
The 9-year-old girl, who has not been identified, was bitten Wednesday when she reached her hand into the animals' exhibit.

The meerkats -- two mates and their three offspring born this spring -- had been vaccinated for rabies but were killed because the girl's parents didn't want her to have to undergo a series of rabies shots, said zoo collections manager Tony Fisher.

State health department rules mandate that exotic animals must be tested for rabies if a bite victim is not treated, said department spokesman Doug Schultz. "And the only way to test the animal is to put it down," he said.

Zoo spokeswoman Kelly Lessard said the animals' destruction was necessary "even though we were 99 percent sure they didn't have rabies. We had to protect the child."

Meerkats are a highly social relative of the mongoose and are native to the African desert. They were popularized in the Disney animated movie "The Lion King" and have been on display at the zoo for about four years.

Pam Bennett-Wallberg, who runs what she calls "a retirement home" for meerkats in the California desert, said the animals "are not at all aggressive. People go into our enclosure all the time, and never in 20 years has anyone been bitten."

Although meerkats are known to carry rabies in the wild, they are routinely vaccinated against the disease when placed in captivity, she said.

"This is a tragedy, one of the saddest things I've heard of in a long time," said Bennett-Wallberg, who attended the grand opening of the Minnesota Zoo meerkat exhibit in 2001.

A 1994 study of meerkats found that only 10 documented cases of rabies-infected meerkats attacking humans or domestic animals in the previous decade.

The girl had climbed atop 3 feet of rock work and reached over a 4-foot glass barrier Wednesday afternoon when she was bitten, said zoo collections manager Tony Fisher said. The rock work is designed to allow kids to climb up for a better view, he said.

Zoo staff members were notified soon after the incident. The exhibit was closed until crews can lower the rock work to prevent anyone else from reaching over the glass, Fisher said.

A second group of meerkats will be moved from an indoor exhibit to the outdoor one when the modifications are complete, a process that should takje a week or two, Lessard said.

The entire family of meerkats was destroyed because it is unknown which one bit the girl, Fisher said, adding there is little to no chance that the animals carried the disease.

Meerkats are curious, bold animals, traits that make them highly popular at zoos, Fisher said, but they are still wild. "We handle them with thick leather gloves," he said. "They're not pets."

Incidents of visitors trying to pet animals or even scaling barriers for a closer view are not uncommon, he said.
 
Ugh!
Sorry she was bitten but that upsets me also. Some parents are just too permissive or unattentive. I'll shut up before I become "too judgemental" for the board.

We watch Meerkat Manor every Friday on Animal Planet and they are the cutest little things to watch!
 
:furious: :furious:

Now see if that were my child it wouldn't have happened but if by some chance it had then my kids would have gotten the shots and learned a valuable lesson about what barriers are for.
 
My DD worked for the Memphis Zoo for years and the stories she could tell about what kids do (with their parents looking on) would curl your hair!

I agree with simpilotswife that rabies shots would have been a great lesson in why you should never reach in an exhibit.

I'm guessing the parents think their precious child was not at fault at all :furious:
 

I'm trying to place where the meercats are. Is it in the tropics area?
 
kejoda said:
I'm trying to place where the meercats are. Is it in the tropics area?

Do you mean where they are in the zoo or where are they geographically. I don't know where the exhibit is at the Minnesota Zoo. It is fairly new according to the original article I read yesterday.
 
/
simpilotswife said:
:furious: :furious:

Now see if that were my child it wouldn't have happened but if by some chance it had then my kids would have gotten the shots and learned a valuable lesson about what barriers are for.


I would hope it would not happen....but at the risk of being attacked...I think my child would be learning a big lesson...getting shots ...rather than have animals killed!!
 
simpilotswife said:
:furious: :furious:

Now see if that were my child it wouldn't have happened but if by some chance it had then my kids would have gotten the shots and learned a valuable lesson about what barriers are for.

Mine, too! Besides, rabies shots these days are not the horror they once were. My neighbor's son was bitten by a chipmunk and had to have the shot (or shots, maybe) and I didn't get the impression it was bad at all. That is such a shame the animals had to be killed. :sad2:
 
:furious:

Wow, 9 years old. Old enough to know better, that's for sure. Not only would she have gotten the rabies shots, she would have gotten a very, very long lecture about respecting animals' habitats and possibly a beating ( :rotfl: ).

I love meerkats and I'm also a big fan of Meerkat Manor.
 
A very similar incident happened here in Richmond a few months ago. A boy and his mom were picnicking at Maymont (local zoo/park). He climbed a wooden fence and reached through a chain link fence to pet a bear. He got bit and they couldn't tell which bear it was, so they destroyed them both. The boy was 4 years old. Huge backlash against the mother in our local news. I personally still think she helped him over the fence, but no one knows for sure.
 
The really sick thing about this, in my mind, is that the parents 'didn't want her to go through the shot series' even though they knew that not only would the animals be killed, but that if there was any small chance the animals had rabies, they would be be stalling what could be life saving medical care for their daughter.

If it were found that the animals DID have rabies, their inaction could have resulted in their childs death, as rabies has the highest likelyhood of recovery when you start treatment immediately.

I would NEVER hesitate to have the rabies series started after a wild animal bite, if the test results came back too late, I couldn't live with that.
 
Pathetic, absolutely pathetic. If I had done this as a kid, my *** would be grass and my mom would be the lawnmower. A rabies series would have been the least of my worries.
 
I have been so livid about this story. I listened to KQ this morning coming in and the backlash against these parents is unbelievable. What about parental (and child) responsbility.

Truly shows what the world is coming to when people feel they don't need to take responsibility for the action of reaching over a 4 foot high fence to pet a WILD animal. Absolutely ludacris!!!!
 
LindsayDunn228 said:
Pathetic, absolutely pathetic. If I had done this as a kid, my *** would be grass and my mom would be the lawnmower. A rabies series would have been the least of my worries.

:lmao: Yeah, me too. Nobody wanted to cross Eleanor. Give me shots anyday, but please don't fling in there with my mother :scared1:
 
That is just so sick. How can people have that little respect for life?
 
I am from Minnesota also and I just read this story this morning.
Makes my blood boil :furious:

First of all the child's 'parents' should have been on that girl about NOT touching a WILD animal!!! DUH!!!!
I know when we go to the zoo my 6 year old KNOWS better then to ever do something like that. I have told him since he was young enough to understand we RESPECT the animals in the zoo, for they are still WILD.
I don't even let me tap on the glass, it's one of my pet peeves when I see people do that. (but that is another story)

But this one, the girl reached OVER the glass to pet the meerkats.... :furious: BOTH the child and the parents are STUPID!!!!!!

It is always the animals that suffer when people do something so stupid like this.

I think it is so sad that INNOCENT animals had to be destoryed because some parents did not watch their child or they didn't care what their child was doing. Sad, sad, sad :sad2: Always the animals that suffer......

IF that was my child and he did something like that you better believe he would be getting those rabies shots! I would not make an animal suffer because of something he was not suppose to be doing.

I think the parents are just selfish and don't want to put their little princess through that, which is something she needs. She probably would think twice of putting her fingers in a wild animal's cage ever again.

This story just makes my blood boil :furious:
 
Wow, 9 years old. Old enough to know better, that's for sure.
What do you think about the NINETEEN year old who decided it would be a good idea to scale a couple of fences and try to pet a tiger in Dublin Zoo? I believe alcohol was a factor in her rash decision which I'm sure she regretted as doctors battled to save her arm.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/5180022.stm

Thankfully the zoo did NOT put the tiger down.
 
Can someone please explain to me WHY they had to put the animals down? Either these meercats or the bears in another post. I can totally understand animals in the wild or say the family dog because the chances of these animals coming into contact with others is pretty high, but in a zoo for the most part the animals are isolated.
 














Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top