I haven't read the RIV POS, but VGF has the same wording, but they rolled back that
point chart too in 2020. The fact it's written in the POS doesn't make it legal. Or if it's legal, it might even be not possible anyway:
We can talk forever about what is a Timeshare Unit and if it's possible to reallocate points across different Units. Florida law is not very clear so it could be interpreted in different ways.
However, one think is absolutely certain. The DVC Management Company must make the interests of the members. I'm not a lawyer, but people more expert than me (
@drusba in particular) have posted the limits within a company with fiduciary duty should operate.
Even if everything else fails, they still are allowed to increase the lockoff premium ONLY if this is in the interests of the majority of the membership. If challenged in court, they must be ready to explain why that decision was taken.
The only possible reason to do that would be if the cost of managing the two separate reservations for a studio and a 1BR is much higher than managing a 2BR, more than the current offset. But, is it? What is the extra cost? Everything is automated (from reservation to DME to checkin), so what's left is the shipping cost for the MB to two separate addresses (which is going away in 2021 since free MB will be history) and cleaning the two rooms separately (does it really take much more?).
The lockoff premium generates a lot of lost points every year, this is already contibuiting to generate enough brekage that every resort hits the maximum offset. If anything at all, the lockoff premium should be decreased!
The increase in the lockoff premium they tried in 2019 could have given Disney millions every year in additional breakage. If they've rolled it back there are very good reasons.