Maybe you should consider a more versatile timeshare? (Tough in cheek ... running to grab my flame suit.)
I did a spreadsheet which calculated the difference and the resulting differences were negligible. The difference in total points available from 2008, which was a leap year, and 2009 (when the point charts were identical) was in the same range as the difference between 2009 & 2010, after reallocation.
Yep, you're correct ... meant "tongue in cheek" ... running and typing are tough to do at the same time. Luv ya, too -- glad we can still be friends.would that be tough in cheek or tongue in cheek?
I suspect at least part of that might be true, but if they do that, where will they bring the points down?
This kind of statement drives me nuts. You say the numbers were "negligible" but what WERE the numbers. Even if they went up by 1 point that's an increase, even if small enough to be considered "negligible".
A death by a thousand cuts is still a death.
The ways the numbers of Weekdays and Weekends vary from year to year and season to season would make it to be a complex calculation. It would be interesting to analyze. But you have to realize, Even if you are paid bi-weekly, you can occasionally get a year with 27 paychecks, things like that cause variances..
I am gonna throw this thought out there....feel free to rebuttal! Ok, if studios are increased, has anyone thought that perhaps this is a backdoor approach to nix the continued demand for small contracts? If demand for studios is driven in part by small contract purchases, this move would in fact all but stifle these types of purchases. Why break up a larger contract only to sell off part of it(40 or 50 points) if they won't be enough for more than a couple of days? It would also affect the resale market for such contracts. Thoughts?
I'm not sure the studio=small contract thing is the driving force. Many people stay in studios to save points. It's not just those who have 40-50 points. Studios are also the major focus of those who rent. Perhaps THAT is the driving force behind that decision.
This kind of statement drives me nuts. You say the numbers were "negligible" but what WERE the numbers. Even if they went up by 1 point that's an increase, even if small enough to be considered "negligible".
A death by a thousand cuts is still a death.
You know. This is what's great about the Disboardsjust this morning, I was talking to my sis about possibly keeping my last BWV contract ( sold my other since our last "member enhancement ) and it's still on the market. Ahhh, new refurbs, working on the pool...yadda yadda yadda...
Then, I pop on and BAM, I'm tickled to death to be getting rid of my DVC again. If I want no customer service, no communication and inability to actually "find" upper management to discuss a problem with, I'll book a flight!
Thanks Disboards!![]()