iluvdisney01
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2007
- Messages
- 144
I'm not sure if this has been asked: But what happens if there are 10 people in your party? Does the automatic 18% still kick-in?
I'm not sure if this has been asked: But what happens if there are 10 people in your party? Does the automatic 18% still kick-in?
You sound like you work for Disney. The old plan was flawed in automatically adding in the tip and can cause bad service. The new plan does not adjust the price enough for the amount you now need to cover the tip. People who use the current plan have every right to go where they want and use it any way they want. If people want a sit down meal everyday, then can have it. Because you feel there are too many people using it, it makes it more difficult for you to book you adr's? I don't see the deluxe plan being something the majority of guests will use. So Disney is squeezing every last dime from it's guests with the new plans, not the other way around. You are losing in the range of $20 per day compared to the current plan. Adding the deluxe plan is fine, if you want it. I think it is a good idea to have this option. Many won't use the deluxe because of cost and you may get any reservation you want when Disney loses large amounts of guests from the ddp, who will not pay what is no longer a good deal. It will come back to hurt them when they are not filling their restaurants. They will lose money. If the plan was dropped about $5.00 per person and no tip included ,then it might be a better option. It makes the servers try to be better for a tip directly from guests and it makes the cost a little better.
I think the intended connotation of "milking the system" is doing things that a reasonable person wouldn't (or shouldn't) such as sharing meals with folks not on your hotel reservation, or deliberately sharing adult CS meals between adult and child so you can use some of the child CS credits in a transgressive manner later.Well saidWhy on EARTH would somebody say that "milking the system" is a bad thing?
What is this silliness about "need"? Any company that operates on "need" shouldn't be in business. The 2007 Dining Plan is under-priced. The 2008 Dining Plan is appropriately-priced. Correcting a wrong -- that's all that is going on here.Well, this is the rant board. 1.2 billion in profits and they needed to cut the DDP by $10-$20 a head. Seems odd.
Just like your last salary increase didn't seem necessary??? Seriously, you made a big deal earlier in your message about getting your money's worth. Why the heck would you criticize Disney for getting theirs? That seems very myopic to me.Doesn't seem necessary.
You are wrong on many of these points. I already have paid for my rooms and continue to do so by paying annual dues which comes out of my pocket every year(and many future years to come). I'm not sure what you mean by pre-pay. Do you mean you pay for ddp now as opposed to when you arrive, which is what I do as a DVC member? If I want passes or ddp, I still have to pay for them. Being a DVC member might mean I am less likely to cancel my reservation, because we have to use our points or lose them, so we will most likely be at wdw. The other point is, if we go and want to go to the parks, we do need to buy some type of passes. I know we don't have to buy passes to use ddp and can see your point as it being a benefit for the cost of us shelling out many thousands of dollars to become a DVC member. Would you go to wdw without going to the parks? Maybe on most days, but this way Disney is getting you to commit to going to their parks to get ddp, by making you pay for passes. I don't hear a lot of complaints when you are able to get free ddp and DVC members do not get that. I'm really not sure why you are getting on DVC members.
Of course, your whole argument falls apart whenever someone makes a reservation for which they aren't foregoing a room discount. So let's just say that your comments only apply to folks who actually forego a room discount -- and I think we also can come to an agreement that we both recommend that folks generally should not forego a room discount so they can qualify for the Dining Plan, but rather should only consider the Dining Plan if they need not forego a room discount to do so.
Nope. You calculated the TOP of the range. Your math didn't factor in buffets, which would represent the bottom of the range. The actual is somewhere in between. However, I think the actual figure was 23%, not 13%. I'll fix my earlier message. Of course, that makes the 2007 Dining Plan now 23% more generous than the 2008 Dining Plan... yet-even-more justification for calling the 2007 Dining Plan "overly-generous", given how many guests still believe that the Dining Plan is worth it for them in 2008, even know that the appetizer is going to be gone, and gratuities aren't going to be included.
I understand that use of buffets may slightly lower the amount of the price increase for DDP from 2007-2008, but for those of us who no longer go to character buffets the increase from 2007 to 2008 is at least 31%. If I change the cost of an appetizer in my calculation from $6 to $8 (you can only get a salad for $6, most appetizers are in the $7-$10 range), the changes to the DDP in 2008 result in a price increase of $14.50 per person/day (adding the cost of an appetizer and tip to the 2008 price) or $37% over the 2007 plan. Inflation is about 3% and while I am not begruding Disney a profit as the do a spectacular job, an increase of this amount borders on outrageous. Also, from what I am reading in this thread and others, there are not many people believing the 2008 plan is worth it.
I, for one, prefer at times to remain silent and just let others rant and rave. It is very interesting to just sit back and observe the posts.![]()
I think your example would be a quick service as opposed to table service meal. And I completely understand why they would say a single-serving beverage for a QS credit - you don't get free refills of any beverage at any QS restaurant. But why would they say that about TS? I believe your brochure is different, but the 2007 DDP brochure I was given at check-in last week doesn't qualify the beverage as being single-serving for either QS or TS. If you look on the Disney website and compare the brief descriptions of the 2007 and 2008 programs, single-serving isn't in the 2007 blurb for either QS or TS and it is in 2008 blurb.
I hope I'm just being overly paranoid here. Maybe they are referring to certain specialty drinks like milkshakes which I have heard people have ordered using the DDP.
What I should do is just write Disney and ask, huh?![]()
Marginal considerations at best, as compared to what we've been discussing.It doesn't fall apart. A person who purchase the DDP has package requirements which result in cancellation provisions and pre-payment requirements that aren't present with a room only reservation. A person who purchases the DDP also has ticket requirements.
I think your computations are way off-base.Unless I project savings of 20-30% the DDP won't be worth it.
Your choice. I surely don't blame you, but you do need to take personal accountability for your decisions that make your own situation a worst-case scenario as compared to the broader population of guests.I understand that use of buffets may slightly lower the amount of the price increase for DDP from 2007-2008, but for those of us who no longer go to character buffets the increase from 2007 to 2008 is at least 31%.
Well, nobody has to buy the DDP if they don't want to. It is not forced on anyone. So, if it is a rotten deal for you, just don't buy it. I look forward to the delux DDP myself.
Also, just because there are a lot of people ranting about the DDP on the discussion threads, that doesn't mean there are not many people believing the 2008 plan is worth it. Those of us who love the DDP in spite of the changes (and there may be a lot of us) are just reading all the posts and enjoying the discussion - I, for one, prefer at times to remain silent[/B]and just let others rant and rave. It is very interesting to just sit back and observe the posts.