10 Nobel Prize Winners Say Bush Endangering America

KarenC

DIS Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 1999
Messages
1,885
Today, 10 Nobel Prize winning economists sent an open letter to the American public. In my line of work, I'm very aware of the effect economic policy has on the well being of our country. Until this administration I was never all that interested in politics. I am liberal on social issues and fairly fiscally conservative, so I usually found something to like about both parties. I have been appalled as I watch President Bush squander our economic well-being. This letter articulates my concerns to a tee:

President Bush and his administration have embarked on a reckless and extreme course that endangers the long-term economic health of our nation. John Kerry understands that sound economic policy requires a substantial change in direction, and we support him for President.

The differences between President Bush and John Kerry with respect to leadership on the economy are wider than in any other Presidential election in our experience. President Bush believes that tax cuts benefiting the most-wealthy Americans are the answer to almost every economic problem. The Bush Administration’s tax cuts were poorly designed and therefore have given insufficient stimulus to job creation. The principal effect of the Bush Administration’s fiscal policies has been to turn budget surpluses into enormous budget deficits. President Bush’s fiscal irresponsibility threatens the long-term economic security and prosperity of our nation. At a time when our nation should be saving for the future, to pay the Medicare and Social Security benefits for the baby boomers, our national debt is swelling; the social contract that binds one generation to another is being threatened with unraveling. Increased borrowing from abroad–now almost five percent of our GDP–leaves our country, our economy and global stability increasingly vulnerable to changes in sentiments of foreign, or even domestic, investors. At the same time, his policies have exacerbated income inequality, failed to address the real wage declines and rising health care costs beleaguering American families, and ignored the need for critical investments to spur long-term growth.

John Kerry will chart a different course. We believe that he will restore fiscal responsibility. He is committed to making key investments in human capital, such as helping families meet the cost of higher education. He has a proposal that will address the problem of rising health care costs. We believe that he has both the ability and the commitment to work with our allies and trading partners to promote global growth that lifts up workers around the world.

John Kerry is our choice for America’s next President. We hope that you will join us.

Signed by the following recipients of the Nobel Prize in Economics:

George A. Akerlof University of California at Berkeley
Kenneth J. Arrow Stanford University
Daniel Kahneman Princeton University
Lawrence R. Klein University of Pennsylvania
Daniel L. McFadden University of California at Berkeley
Douglass C. North Washington University St. Louis
Paul A. Samuelson MIT
William F. Sharpe Stanford University
Robert M. Solow MIT
Joseph E. Stiglitz Columbia University
 
I don't know for certain yet who I am for, so I'm not saying anything good or bad about that letter. But did anyone else notice that all those people are men? I don't know - just strikes me as odd that on a list that long there is not one woman. I wonder what people would think if everyone on the list was a woman :confused3.
 

I'm happy they've made their choice. Don't know what effect this will have on the electorate however. For me endorsements are like don't carry any weight. I'm not sure why politicians tout them so and cater to get them.
 
Originally posted by KarenC
10 Nobel Prize Winners Say Bush Endangering America

We all know that 10 nobel prize winners from such conservative bastions as Berkeley and Princeton couldn't be wrong. They'd probably all vote for Carter if he were running.
 
Originally posted by KristaTX
I don't know for certain yet who I am for, so I'm not saying anything good or bad about that letter. But did anyone else notice that all those people are men? I don't know - just strikes me as odd that on a list that long there is not one woman. I wonder what people would think if everyone on the list was a woman :confused3.

It is odd-- I work at a college and my department includes the Economics department. We've only had two female economics instructors in the three years I've been here and around 9 male instructors. We have very few women apply for positions in that program. I was also looking for information on female economists for Women's History Month (I had famous women from each of our programs) and could only find a limited number.
 
I'm not sure how much effect they have either. I freely admit I know little about economics other than how to manage my own money. But I certainly prefer that 10 acknowledged experts approve my candidate's plan, than have then accuse him of having "embarked on a reckless and extreme course that endangers the long-term economic health of our nation." It confirms my belief in my candidate.
 
Through my job, I have known Douglass North, the Nobel Prize winner from Washington University St. Louis for over 10 years (before he even won the prize) - he's really brilliant!
 
Krista, the reason there are no women on that list is because no woman has yet won the Nobel Prize in Economics. It's one of the more junior Nobel Prizes (started in 1968 or 69? I think?). I'm sure we'll see some women win it in the future, though. :)
 
Originally posted by BedKnobbery2
Krista, the reason there are no women on that list is because no woman has yet won the Nobel Prize in Economics. It's one of the more junior Nobel Prizes (started in 1968 or 69? I think?). I'm sure we'll see some women win it in the future, though. :)

Thanks for the info :).
 
After I posted this I did a search on opensecrets.org to see if any of these economists were active contributors to the democratic party. I looked at the 2000 and the 1996 election--only two of them had made reportable donations. So they aren't an overwhelmingly partisan bunch.
 
Originally posted by Frank Babaganoush
We all know that 10 nobel prize winners from such conservative bastions as Berkeley and Princeton couldn't be wrong. They'd probably all vote for Carter if he were running.

Yes, but Stanford has the Hoover Institute.
 
We all know that 10 nobel prize winners from such conservative bastions as Berkeley and Princeton couldn't be wrong. They'd probably all vote for Carter if he were running.
"Right you are, Ken!"
 
They definitely all have preexisting Democratic ideology. But Kahneman is the smartest man I've ever met. When he makes a point of something, I try to listen.
 
Originally posted by Frank Babaganoush
We all know that 10 nobel prize winners from such conservative bastions as Berkeley and Princeton couldn't be wrong. They'd probably all vote for Carter if he were running.

So you actually believe that people who have devoted their lives to a subject, been awarded for for their efforts, would put their reputations on the line and lie to further their own political agenda. Now where have we all seen this tactic uused repeatedly: When you cannot argue the message, smear the messenger.
 
Originally posted by Frank Babaganoush
We all know that 10 nobel prize winners from such conservative bastions as Berkeley and Princeton couldn't be wrong. They'd probably all vote for Carter if he were running.

This is the most stupid and sickening response to a poliical thread that I have read thus far. You are making an idiot of yourself for even saying something like this. I have never ever flamed anyone, and rarely will I stick my head into a political fight here on the boards, but this is just ridiculous. THEY HAVE WON THE NOBEL PRIZE IN ONE OF THE MOST CONSERVATIVE FIELDS OF ACADEMIA. I work for a Princeton Grad who then went on to the Warton Business School. I know no one more conservative than he is. You CAN NOT make a broad sweeping referrence about someone's social policies and their political beliefs based on a bias you have against an academic institution.

This is a very important letter to be taken extremely seriously. This is not a Democratic or Republican group. This is a group of experts in economics who feel they need to make their voices heard.

What qualifications do you have in this matter to so judge the validity of their message?
 
Originally posted by castlegazer
What qualifications do you have in this matter to so judge the validity of their message?
Since when does someone need to provide qualifications on the DISboards in order to express their opinion? Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, even and especially when it disagrees with yours or mine or even everyone elses.

Quite frankly, I found his post quite humorous. ::yes::
 
I stopped reading the article when they said they opposed tax cuts for the rich. Nobel Prize winners or not, they don't seem to understand who pays the most in taxes in America. :rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by Abracadabra
Since when does someone need to provide qualifications on the DISboards in order to express their opinion? Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, even and especially when it disagrees with yours or mine or even everyone elses.

Quite frankly, I found his post quite humorous. ::yes::

The poster was not stating their opinion of the message, but attacking the economists. Arguing the message would have been engaging in healthy debate. Attacking the messengers to dismiss their words as unimportant is quite different.
 












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top