DVC-Landbaron
What Would Walt Do?
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2000
Nah! Ill leave that to Rich on the DVC board. He does a very good job!!!Maybe you should start a thread on the false advertising and misleading sales tactics of DVC.
I do. And fairly unnecessary for most of the year. AND, if theyd enforce the rule for the true gate crashers theyd eliminate a great deal of the over crowding! Instead they blame the DVC and take this right of ownership away ALL YEAR!! Thats just p[lain silly. I was perfectly content to play it by ear. Call ahead. See how the day went. Play second fiddle to the guests at the Beach and Yacht Club. But now Im not even in the band!! NOT A CHANCE to go there on a light day. NEVER!! RESTRICTED!! Sorry. That doesnt add up to owner in my book!I still maintain that restrictions on SAB are not a bad thing.
How is this any better than the if theres room policy of last year? You mean to tell me that suddenly, when the census is down, we bad DVCers have overrun the pool!! Come on!Disappointing, yes. Bad, no. Disney is trying to preserve the guest experience.
Not nearly enough, my friend.Nuff said on SAB.
No. Now there isnt. But when it first opened there was. Why was that?Now for AKL and Wilderness. There is no restriction on the Wilderness Lodge pool.
So am I!!! So much for the owner concept!! I guess they mean an owner of Disney back before the concept died. But not an owner of anything afterwards!! Pretty stupid, isnt it?!?!?!AKL is not open to pool hopping. I am at a loss on that one.
I never said it was the death of pool hopping (although I think it may go that way). What I said was that it was the Death of the OWNER concept. And it is. Plain and simple. Otherwise wed be swimming in AKL! Can you explain to this guy who clearly doesnt get it, why we cant?You have got me. However, I don't see the restriction on SAB and ALK as representing the death of pool hopping and the total elimination of DVC per?s (not that many true per?s ever existed, at least not that many things that couldn't be had through Disney club or Annual Passholder benefits).
Yep! You are there already!!I'm sure you will launch into the slippery slope argument. First SAB, then AKL, what next?
So now its temporary? I didnt know that!! If thats really true Ill do a little apologizing!! (Not much though. Theres still AKL and Wilderness when it first opened!)forgets everywhere else they can go, and doesn't even bother to look at why there was a temporary restriction.
Mr. Fans,
And a very good theory!! And it is one that Ive thought about, long and hard. But I really dont think that has much to do with it. Let me clarify.In the "good old days", folks thought Disney was spending a great deal of time and money to make the customers happy when, in reality Disney was simply so far ahead of the competition in terms of customer service that it only appeared that they were spending a great deal of time and money. Since then, the competition has learned the Disney secret and have caught up in terms of customer service making Disney look more average in comparison. Could this "good old days syndrome" be affecting our friends in Car 3 to a degree?
It's just a theory...
I think that what you say is very true. Disney did spend an inordinate amount of time, energy and cash providing service that was light-years ahead of the competition. In recent years, as you note, the competition (really only Universal) has closed that gap. And I think that if Disney had maintained their standards and held fast to the Walt philosophy, theyd still be hundreds of thousands of miles ahead, but no longer light-years. And then I might agree that I would be worried about the closing of the gap and might indeed fall into that trap. But it is not so. And I really havent had the opportunity to think about it that way. Because it is clear, to virtually EVERYONE, that they have let their standards slip to an all time low, have totally forgotten just what their product really is and they ignore their philosophy. THAT is much more important than how an obscure Baron remembers Disney.