wvrevy, this is what happens when you rely on the liberal media

bsnyder

DIS Legend
Joined
Apr 21, 2000
Messages
12,342
as your source of information.

On the Clinton thread, you linked to this AP wire story:

Audience boos as Bush offers best wishes for Clinton's recovery
Friday September 03, 2004

WEST ALLIS, Wis. (AP) President Bush on Friday wished Bill Clinton ``best wishes for a swift and speedy recovery.''

``He's is in our thoughts and prayers,'' Bush said at a campaign rally.

Bush's audience of thousands in West Allis, Wis., booed. Bush did nothing to stop them.

Bush offered his wishes while campaigning one day after accepting the presidential nomination at the Republican National Convention in New York. Clinton was hospitalized in New York after complaining of mild chest pain and shortness of breath.

Bush recently praised Clinton when the former president went to the White House for the unveiling of his official portrait. He lauded Clinton for his knowledge, compassion and ``the forward-looking spirit that Americans like in a president.''

My good friends at www.powerlineblog.com have exposed this story for the fraud that it is.

A number of people who were at the rally and didn't hear any boos sent angry emails to the AP, which resulted in a rewrite of the story. If you follow the link to the original story, this is what you get. Nothing.

The AP put up a revised version which is exactly the same as the original, except that it omits the two sentences about the crowd booing and Bush "doing nothing to stop them." No explanation and, as of yet, no apology.

Meanwhile, someone came up with an audio of the President Bush's speech, which is linked to by Drudge. Listen to it here. The audio is stunning. When the President says that he's just received word that Clinton had been hospitalized, you can hear the crowd react with sympathy and dismay. When Bush goes on to say that President Clinton is in our thoughts and prayers, and we send him our best wishes for a speedy recovery, the crowd applauds and cheers enthusiastically. No booing. None.

Note that the AP didn't say "there were scattered boos" (there weren't) or even "one guy booed." The AP reported, falsely, that "Bush's audience of thousands in West Allis, Wis., booed." That isn't spin; it's a flat-out lie. And the AP writer added the malicious embellishment that Bush did nothing to stop the (nonexistent) booing.

Is this the most astonishing example of media bias I can remember? Offhand, yes. It is sheer, malicious fabrication and slander--of President Bush and of Republicans generally--in what purports to be a brief, factual account of Bush's speech.

What this shows, I guess, is that the establishment media are in a full panic mode over John Kerry's prospects. Any semblance of professionalism, or even basic honesty, in this instance, is gone.

The AP needs to do some serious soul-searching, and fire, at a minimum, the guy who wrote that story, if it wants to retain even a shred of credibility.

While I was typing this, video footage of the West Allis rally was played on Fox News, but without any mention of the AP fabrication.

UPDATE: The AP's lie is spreading rapidly around the globe. Salon says: "Audience boos as Bush offers best wishes for Clinton's recovery." WSTM television in New York has a slightly different version of the story, with an AP copyright, which says: "Many in Bush's audience booed when Clinton's name was mentioned. The president made no comment on that and continued with his rally speech." WRIC television in northern Virginia has the same "many booed" story. In Iowa, KWWL television reports that "Many in Bush's audience booed when Clinton's name was mentioned. The president made no comment on that and continued with his rally speech." The same misinformation is being promulgated in Georgia, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Mississippi, California, Tennessee, Indiana, the Carolinas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Ohio, Minnesota, and New York again.

I'll stop there, but there are many more. Do you suppose that all of these news outlets will offer corrections? What proportion of the people who hear this story will ever find out that it was a complete lie, fabricated, apparently, by a Democrat who works for the AP?
 
Exactly, watched the event on tv today and there was no cheering. Give me a break, anyone who believed that even after reading it, is naive. Another example of the liberal media out to oust our Commander.
 
Having worked for years as a copy editor at daily newspapers, I have been burned by incorrect AP stories many times. Frankly, I'm a staunch democrat, but I was stunned when I heard about the crowd booing. I thought there must be a mistake. I'm glad it was. I don't want to hate Republicans, I just want to disagree with them. Thanks, BSnyder, for setting the record straight.
 
I saw coverage on TV & didn't hear any booing.
 

I watched it as well, and I heard no booing. I'm not sure where AP would have gotten the idea that people were booing.
 
I'm having a lively little disagreement through email with Josh Marshall right now. He's a liberal writer/commentator with his own blog, www.talkingpointsmemo.com. He's a regularly featured columnist with Washington Monthly and The Hill and one of many liberal writers that I read on a regular basis.

He was quick to point out the AP story this morning, on his blog, and then, to his credit, he did correct the story with a quick "it appears this wasn't true" kind of comment.

He doesn't think it could possibly be bias. Just a 'mistake".


:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
(puts on wvrevy hat)

But surely this one example of a lone reporter lying like this isn't a representation of the entire media. :rolleyes:
 
Trust me, there are soooooooooooooooooo many AP writers, that it would be beyond statistical probability that some of them wouldn't have some bias. I've seen it many times. Again, I am very happy this story is untrue.
 
The Associated Press is one of the news outlets that engages in this type of stuff on a regular basis.

And what's so egregious about it is that so many other newspapers around the country rely on the AP as their news source for countless stories.

Most of the other examples are of the "spin" variety.

But now they're resorting to out and out lying.
 
Originally posted by bsnyder


He doesn't think it could possibly be bias. Just a 'mistake".



Yeah, right.

He must have gotten his write up on the Zell Miller speech the other night when he was hammering Kerry.
 
He references a "she" in his emails, but he says he's not invested in whomever this reporter may be. But I'm guessing he knows who it is.
 
Give me a break, anyone who believed that even after reading it, is naive.
LOL, I am naive...{{{hanging my head in shame}}}...I believed it. It just wouldn't surprise me that some poeple could be insensitive...from either side. I saw it here when Reagan died.

I am really glad it didn't happen. But, I am sure there are people who are cracking jokes...human nature ain't pretty.
 
I'm shocked! I thought the liberal media didn't lie:rolleyes: :bounce:

Thanks for the story --- it made my weekend, along with Bush's 11 point lead over Kerry.
 
Thanks Bet for the link to powerlineblog. There are quite a few other interesting pieces there as well.
 
Originally posted by disney4us2002
Thanks Bet for the link to powerlineblog. There are quite a few other interesting pieces there as well.

The guys at powerline have a terrific blog. It's one of my "must reads" every day.
 
Thanks, Bet, for taking the time to print all this out. I heard it on our local station, KFI, today, and they played the audio a few times, and there were clearly no boos heard.

It's so disheartening to not be able to trust the media in any venue. :(

(... and I'm talking about both sides here - I want the truth - whether it be pro Democrat or pro Republican - Is that too much to ask anymore?)
 
Interesting...the press got something wrong. And it is always good to see the record set straight. Hardly seems fair to turn it into a snarky comment to wvrevy though. I seem to recall just recently a thread that went on for pages and pages about Kerry wanting a book "banned" even though the source had removed the story from it's website before the thread was even one page long. Even though it was pointed out that Drudge had removed the story, the poster never backed down or changed her thread title. It does kind of make you look like someone who is eager to set the record straight, but only when it suits your agenda doesn't it?
 
Originally posted by bsears
Interesting...the press got something wrong. And it is always good to see the record set straight. Hardly seems fair to turn it into a snarky comment to wvrevy though. I seem to recall just recently a thread that went on for pages and pages about Kerry wanting a book "banned" even though the source had removed the story from it's website before the thread was even one page long. Even though it was pointed out that Drudge had removed the story, the poster never backed down or changed her thread title. It does kind of make you look like someone who is eager to set the record straight, but only when it suits your agenda doesn't it?

Not sure if you're confusing me with another poster, but the book banning thread wasn't mine.

And yes, the press got it wrong. Because they made the whole thing up. Are you trying to say you think it was just a "mistake"? If so, I'd love to hear a logical explaination for how such a "mistake" could happen, given the fact that there is audio and video that clearly shows there were no boos. And yet the AP reporter clearly stated:

"Bush's audience of thousands in West Allis, Wis., booed."
 











Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE











DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top