Your route goes backstage where the buses enter the bus stop area. I would think Disney wouldn't want pedestrians anywhere near that backstage area, nor in the bus transportation area. Plus they would have to install overhead walkways at the road crossing areas. I think it comes down to cost/benefit. What do they gain by installing a pedestrian-safe walkway?It wouldn't have to get near any enclosures. If they just started a pathway from the end of the bus stop it would be a little over a mile and could just follow the existing roads. Black Lake Rod would take some finagling but it's definitely doable.
Us too, the last 3 years we were at BWV, BWV, BCV and didnt use the boat we walk!See, I said yes for just the opposite of this. We always use the walkway between the Epcot resorts and HS and usually even walk from HS to Epcot.
Your route goes backstage where the buses enter the bus stop area. I would think Disney wouldn't want pedestrians anywhere near that backstage area, nor in the bus transportation area. Plus they would have to install overhead walkways at the road crossing areas. I think it comes down to cost/benefit. What do they gain by installing a pedestrian-safe walkway?
It's longer than Boardwalk to Epcot or HS but could be about the same distance as Epcot or Y&BC to HS.That map looks a lot longer than the walk from BWI to Epcot or HS! I would love to walk if it wasn't 100 degrees outside and I didn't have toddlers.
I took the boat from Epcot to the resorts because it was there when I left the park. omg. i got off the next stop it was going so slow it drove me nuts. never again.Ah, but we are in the minority!!! I always laugh at the people in the line for the boat to DHS at BW. I know I'm going to get there a lot faster than they are!! But, most people still take that boat. I can't imagine that it would be much different at AKL...not to mention that some of the rooms are practically in another city!!! That really adds to the time on your feet!!!
Your route goes backstage where the buses enter the bus stop area. I would think Disney wouldn't want pedestrians anywhere near that backstage area, nor in the bus transportation area. Plus they would have to install overhead walkways at the road crossing areas. I think it comes down to cost/benefit. What do they gain by installing a pedestrian-safe walkway?
Because they had a problem filling AKL, they converted two floors to DVC. People always complain about the long, long bus rides (13 minutes to Epcot anyone? Not that long). I don't see where they could justify raising the rate to cover the expenses of that path. It would have to include lots of tall fencing, security cameras and perhaps in some locations CMs stationed in booths to keep the guests on the path. It's too isolated.If AKL becomes a more desireable resort, you can charge a higher rate. Because a path doesn't have a very high operating cost, it could pay for itself fairly quickly. The route I put was just an example for distance (nothing I propose) but the walk from CR to MK runs along the bus stop as well. It would take some fencing and finagling but it could be done without huge changes.
Which is what got me thinking what are some things Disney can do to increase the desirability of the resort. The inability to walk from Grand Floridian to the Magic Kingdom (and that sole factor) puts it as a no-go on my list. I'll opt for Bay Lake, Polynesian, Boardwalk, Y&B Club and even Animal Kingdom lodge (simply for the savings) than pay and NOT be able to walk to any park. Almost all the costs of a path connecting AKL to AK would be upfront and could be made up very quickly with even the slightest rate hike or increase in occupancy. Most people who stay at deluxe resorts that I know that don't stay at AKL will blame transportation as the reason....a path would be a welcomed shot in the arm for the closest park.Because they had a problem filling AKL, they converted two floors to DVC. People always complain about the long, long bus rides (13 minutes to Epcot anyone? Not that long). I don't see where they could justify raising the rate to cover the expenses of that path. It would have to include lots of tall fencing, security cameras and perhaps in some locations CMs stationed in booths to keep the guests on the path. It's too isolated.
It will never happen (and never will bikes/bike trails).
Disney is a target for every sue happy guest out there and all they need is a bunch of clueless guests stepping off and getting hit by a car or bus, bit by a snake, traumatized by an armadillo, burn by fire ants, passing out from heat stroke ... and there would be a stack of lawsuits for Disney not managing the wildlife or providing barriers so folks don't fall off the sidewalk etc.
... and all those sidewalks would have to be monitored.
I don't think it will happen either but it's not like walkways are unheard of at wdw. Besides the boardwalk-DHS walkway there is a long stretch of sidewalk between the all stars resorts and Coronado which doesn't appear to be monitored or policed. You can walk to Blizzard beach from any of those resorts and I've taken many morning jogs along that route.
On our recent (first) stay at AKL, we commented on how we love the 'secluded' aspect of the resort. We're AP, so we often spend half days just lounging around the resort and we felt it was more 'resort-like' since it was a distance. HOWEVER, we would definitely have loved a path to AK since it's our favorite of all.
If AKL becomes a more desireable resort, you can charge a higher rate. Because a path doesn't have a very high operating cost, it could pay for itself fairly quickly. The route I put was just an example for distance (nothing I propose) but the walk from CR to MK runs along the bus stop as well. It would take some fencing and finagling but it could be done without huge changes.
I guarantee if they never built that McDonalds there would be no path. The path was to keep all those walking to McD from AllStars and BB safe. I think CSR link happened just because it was there. We actually don't know if it is monitored.
Most of the Epcot/DHS walkway is not along roads but contained and a true pedestrian walk.
There is no reason at all for walking paths. They provide buses, they want you on buses and they don't want to have to create safe crossings and deal with guest issues.