bcla
On our rugged Eastern foothills.....
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2012
- Messages
- 25,757
No. The country hosting the Olympics already has to spend way too much money on venues of limited use after the games are over. IOC doesn't care what sort of debt the hosting country is stuck with and seems to be living in the past. Olympics USED to be about amateur athletics and when they added professional golfers or basketball players to the list made NO sense to me. Adding other pro sports would be a mistake.
The whole idea of "amateurism" was always a farce. People got paid as professionals in all but name. If you look at old AAU basketball teams with players participating in the Olympics, they were often considered employees of the team sponsor. In 1936 (the first Olympics for basketball) the gold medal winning USA team was about half players from the Universal Pictures team. The old Soviet Union nominally called their athletes members of the military, even though their sole job was to be an athlete.
They've gotten a lot of criticism over wanting large building expenses, and they're frankly OK with using existing infrastructure. The LA Olympics in 2028 isn't going to cost that much. Certainly not as much as Beijing. And the key to LA is that they've vastly improved their public transportation infrastructure.