Is it staying long-term in a place that someone has died in that freaks people out?
(I am aware that I'm evil for bringing this up, but it's one of those things that has always puzzled me.) Most hotels have had deaths. If you've never stayed in a room that's had a death, you've likely slept next door to a hotel room that's had at least one death. And if you stay at casino hotels, it's likely some of those deaths were from, ahem, exhertions or were suicides. (You got yer happy deaths and yer not-so-happy deaths.)
If you've ever slept at a quaint B&B in a very old house, you've most certainly stayed at a place where other people have died.
So what's the difference between that and buying a house someone has died in. For that matter, doesn't that limit you to only brand new houses?
I was curious about this, as well. So for those of you who refuse to live in a home where someone has died--what about an apartment building? You'd never know who had died where.
It just seems so odd to me although my dd did ask me similar questions when we purchased our home. The lady had retired and moved to Florida and dd thought it was suspicious that she only communicated by mail.![]()
I guess my feeling is that everyone dies. It would be hard to find property--even new buldings--where someone had not died on the grounds or in a previous building on the same site. Now if it were a horrific death like say, the Sharon Tate home, then I would probably not be able to live there. But if Grandma passed away in her sleep upstairs, I'm fine with that.

Absolutely positively not even a chance would I EVER want to step foot in a potential house that I'd buy if someone died in it. End. Of Story.
![]()
!
