Would you let your 7 year old go to WDW without you?

Not yet a parent, but my fiance has a niece and nephew (aka soon to be my niece and nephew) and I have a godchild and several kinda godchildren. I/we are very involved in there lives and I'm happy to help babysit etc. It sounds like SIL was offering to pay for your son to go on a trip in addition to providing you free child care. It is your right to say no, but from my perspective your reasons sound selfish and if I was in her place I'd start to feel like I was being used rather valued for my role in that child's life and would start to say no a lot more. It's no fair to use her for the work and not let her have the fun which is what it sounds like to me.
 
I'm late to this thread, but wow, I'm speechless.

The obvious compromise would be traveling as a whole family sooner (with the baby and the son while he's still young enough to believe in the magic--not 11 like she's planning on) and bring the SIL for extra help.

We just got back from a week long trip with our 3 year old and nine month old. We brought our nanny. It was a fantastic trip. DH and I still did most of the "parenting chores" but it was incredible to have an extra adult around. And yes--we actually pay our nanny wages and still treated her to this trip. I'm speechless that you pay your SIL zilch but think paying for her WDW trip is out of the question.

Oh and guess what? My baby cried on the plane. Big whoop dee do. It's a flight to Orlando filled with families. Other babies cried too but we all managed to survive the 2.5 hour flight just fine. It's ridiculous to use that as an excuse unless you are talking about flying from Europe or something.
 
How is she being taken advantage of? We do use her for child care, but she doesn't HAVE to do it, she does it because she loves the kids and loves to spend time with them. I see it as being mutually beneficial to all parties involved, us, her and the kids. Yes, we save a ton of money, but she gets to be way more involved in the kids' lives than she would be if she didn't take care of them so often.

She's being taken advantage of because she's good enough to be free daycare but not good enough to be allowed any special time with the kids. She's fine for when YOU want something, but when she asks to be allowed the favor of doing something wonderful for your kid, that's out of the question because someone might have a good time with the most important person in your world being present.

I hope this woman finds out how funny you think it is that she's at your beck and call and has a good "LOL" at your resultant daycare bill. It's a shame her brother doesn't stick up for her.
 
I just want to say I just got back from taking my 6 year old niece on her first trip to WDW. Her parents did not come with me. (it was me, my niece, and my mom). This thread made me appreciate even more the time I got to spend with my niece at WDW. The trip has so many memories that I know her and I will never forget. Part of me feels bad because I took a lot of "first time" memories away from her mom and dad (i.e. first trip to WDW, first time on a big kid roller coaster, etc.). While her parents would have loved to come on the trip they couldn't afford for the whole family to go. Her parents also know that I know Disney better than anyone else they know and I would provide her a trip like no one else could. My niece has only spent the night with me once and had never been away from her parents for as long as we were on the trip. Yet, her parents trusted me (and my mom) and chose to not be selfish by keeping their child from having these memories with me and my mom because they couldn't go. Even though I got to take my niece on her first trip, I know if her parents are able to take her in the future that they will also share many more memories because one trip doesn't take away the memories of another trip. The trip in the future with her parents, if there is one, will be very different then the trip use had with me. Also, she is only young once and is just barely still in the stage of still believing the characters are real.

Anyways, a lot of words to say this thread just completely surprises me. It's not that OP won't let her child go but the reason is such a selfish reason. Hopefully, OP as started to re-think her decision and her reasons for her decision.
 

Nope, but not for the same reasons that you have. I don't let my children travel without me, it's just something that my husband and I don't like. That being said, I HAVE taken babies to WDW and as young as 4 months old we have flown and driven and both were fine. The children have to get used to travel at some point and while they were free, we used to go twice a year! LOL
 
Good morning. I am new to these forums and hoping to get some different perspectives, as they seem to be a wealth of information.

Here's my dilemma: The other day my sister in law asked if she could take my son with her on vacation to WDW in the next 12 months. My immediate response was "No". When she asked why I told her because I want to go. We have a new baby and I will not be traveling with her for a few years, as I don't want to subject others on a plane to her crying. We have been to WDW twice with my son.

I am wondering if I should let sis in law take him. She watches him all summer (she is a teacher so off in summers) and several afternoons a week during the school year. She is extremely helpful filling in whenever needed for getting him to dentist appointments, sports practices, homework help and just general babysitting (for both kids). My son loves her and has no problem staying with her and sleeps over her house on a regular basis.

I am conflicted and would love to hear what others think.

Given that it's not your son's first trip, that it will be a while before you go with your new baby, and that your SIL watches him already...I'd let him go. Would I be disappointed at not going myself? Definitely..but that shouldn't stop me from allowing him to go. Just my 2 cents :)
 
I just feel like for these special memories, I should be a part of them. He's my kid, after all.

If it were a first trip I'd agree with yiu. But it isnt. Your son has gone twice already. Perhaps you could still be part of the memories by having your SIL Skype you/facetime you while they are in the parks.

Personally, I also don't understand why taking the baby is such an issue. Babies are *much* easier on flights than toddlers and preschoolers.
 
Ok so it looks like OP has gotten many responses to her original question so I'm going to ask a question of my own. I don't mean to thread jack but I'm thinking anyone who responded to this thread will also have an answer to my question.

When our DD was about 1 year old (our first child, she is now 8yo) her grandparents said they would like to take her to Sesame Place for an overnight stay. We replied, "what a great idea, that sounds like fun. When are we going?" They said "no, we don't want you to go with us. We want to take her by ourselves". We were kind of shocked at this and said no. In case your wondering, Sesame Place is about a 4-hour drive from our home and is located in another state. We wanted to get to the bottom of why they didn't want us to go so we explained that we do not expect them to pay for us in any way in case it was just about the $$$. They told us it had nothing to do with money and they just didn't want us to be there because they felt they had a right to have "alone time" with their granddaughter.

So I was hoping for opinions on how others would have handled this situation. Do you think this was a totally reasonable request? Or would you have been a little hesitant given the way it was presented? BTW, grandparents are both in their 60s and are able-bodied healthy people so the physical aspect of carrying/caring for a baby was not an issue. We just found it to be a little creepy that they specifically told us we were NOT welcome to go with them.
I don't think it's creepy. It would have hurt to hear the way it seems it was said, but I don't think wanting to spend time with their grandchild alone is creepy.
 
Agreed weird is a better word. And to elaborate. They live less than 5 miles from us, they had never babysat for us when this occurred. Grandpa (actually Step-Grandpa) wants nothing to do with us or grandkids since that day and Grandma had babysat only 5 times since then and each time was for no more than 4-6 hours. Once was when our 2nd child was born and the others were when we had to attend things that out DD couldn't go to (wedding, funeral, etc.) Needless to say, the relationship soured that day and it never really recovered. The sad thing is we think it is mostly Grandpa's doing and Grandma is suffering now because of it. She still visits DD and DS frequently buy we suspect she is not being truthful to Grandpa about how frequent/how long she visits.

DW recently tried to visit their house with our kids and it didn't go well. They have several large dogs that are not very well-behaved. They are not mean/dangerous dogs in the sense that they bite. But they constantly jump up on people uncontrollably. Sometimes even knocking down adults. When we asked them to put the dogs in a separate room while we were ther so that they wouldn't hurt DD8 and DS18 months, Granpa refused and got in DW face and began yelling at her about how she's paranoid, crazy, etc. I'm thankful I wasn't there to witness this because I probably would have done/said things that I would later regret. I wanted to pay him a visit on my own after this incident but DW talked me out of it. So to summarize, they're pretty much out of their minds if they think we will ever leave our kids alone with them.
OK, that information is totally different anf reading this, I wouldn't have let them take my child overnight either.
 
I would let him go.
Though your reasons are understandable, they are also selfish. You would have your son miss out on a truly exciting vacation because you wouldn't be involved.
You must be conflicted, or you wouldn't have asked hundreds of strangers. And no matter what the majority says, you will make the decision that best suits you. But in your shoes, I would let my son go. Life is short, experiences like these are few and far between, and tomorrow is not promised. So I would give my son the opportunity to have fun and make memories with his beloved aunt. And when the time comes that you are willing to travel, he will make memories with you and his new little sister. The thing about happy memories is that we always have room for more.
 
I don't know if that would work out so well. Paying for her entire vacation seems a bit much to me. Plus we have very different ideas of how a Disney vacation should be. We only like to go to two parks at most when we are there and spend the majority of our time by the pool. I don't know if she would even like that.

All the more reason to let him go with her now. You are saying you don't want him to go because you'll miss out on special memories with him..but your statement here shows the type of trip, and the type of memories, he will get with his aunt are very different than the type of trip and memories he will have when he goes again with you. There is room for both sets of memories.
 
Make whatever decision you want about letting him go or not. As a single, childless aunt, I am appalled at many of the other things you said. Thinking that someone always enjoys watching your kids for free because she loves them, not so much. An unwillingness to let her join you on a trip and pay for it after all she has done, pretty selfish. The suggestion that "if she wants to do these things with kids, just have her own" cruel and beyond the pale. I adore my nephews and would do anything in the world for them. I also would have loved to have had my own children, but life doesn't always give us everything we want. While I try to share my "mothering" instincts in a variety of ways, there are times that the hurt about that can be so deep and so strong it takes my breath away. I hope she never catches wind of this thread. If I were to read something similar from my brother and SIL, it would be beyond painful. I wish your children all the wonderful things in the world. I hope you take a good hard look at how you are willing to treat and talk about others. Realize that sometimes a smile and laughter are the only way folks can make it through things are too difficult for words.
 
Honestly, I am having a hard time understanding the attitude of not letting them have fun without you. I would hope you would just appreciate the opportunity and the time alone with your baby while your son is having a great time with a family member that loves him dearly.

Selfish, selfish, selfish! To deny a child because YOU cannot take part in the joy. Shameful.

So my husband and I decided not to let my son go. He can go in a few years with us when his sister is a little bit older. I told my SIL, who was disappointed. She asked us to reconsider, giving the reason that we use her in our place quite frequently so we must trust her. We told her that wasn't the issue. We just don't want him to go without us. She'll get over it and lucky for me, she loves my kids too much so I'll never lose my free and almost always available child care! Lol!

Do not be too sure about that. SIL may rethink her generosity and let you rethink who is the lucky one.

I just feel like for these special memories, I should be a part of them. He's my kid, after all.

And I don't really think I am taking advantage of my sister in law. She loves spending time with the kids so that's a benefit for her. If she didn't, she could say no. Plus, it's family and I don't really think you should have to pay family for helping you out. I helped her move a few years ago and I didn't expect any type of compensation. Same kind of thing.

For the love of all that is holy, you take the cake. You are doing HER a favor? Many years ago I was told I was privileged to change my DH cousins baby. Last diaper I changed. SOmetimes there are people who are blinded by greed and I think you may be one of those people.

OP here. I am not a troll and was genuinely interested in other people's take on the situation and what they would do. I thought that was the kind of the point of these boards. I won't apologize for my feelings about wanting to experience special moments with my kids. I know I do rely on my SIL a lot and trust isn't the issue here. I just don't to miss out on special times with my kids. We will go back to WDW in 3 or 4 years and that will be fine.

I have no words.

You are right, that did come across as insensitive, but I wasn't trying to be.

Most of your posts come across as insensitive. I am still speechless about the childless comment.

How is she being taken advantage of? We do use her for child care, but she doesn't HAVE to do it, she does it because she loves the kids and loves to spend time with them. I see it as being mutually beneficial to all parties involved, us, her and the kids. Yes, we save a ton of money, but she gets to be way more involved in the kids' lives than she would be if she didn't take care of them so often.

Lucky her! You better hope that your SIL does not decide she is way too invested in what is clearly a one sided relationship.

Again, I don't feel she is being taken advantage of, since she could say "No, I don't want to watch the kids." Yes, she is a very good babysitter and does a lot with and for the kids, she is also easy going with last minute changes in plans, which I appreciate a lot but that doesn't mean I should automatically let her take my kid on a vacation that I will take him on in a few years.



I don't know if that would work out so well. Paying for her entire vacation seems a bit much to me. Plus we have very different ideas of how a Disney vacation should be. We only like to go to two parks at most when we are there and spend the majority of our time by the pool. I don't know if she would even like that.

You know what? You are right. I would not travel with you either, even if it was a fully paid for trip.

My children went to Disney with their grandparents (I had taken them once a couple of years before), I stayed home and was green with envy the entire time but now years later they still talk about little things from their trip so I know I made the right decision for them. I also let the same grandparents take them to Sesame Place without me. That wasn't as much of a big deal for me, I like going there but not like I enjoy going to Disney. We live in MA so both SP and Disney involved some travel (SP is about 4 hours driving without stopping).

I took my DGD to Disney when she was 4. It was not her first trip, so Mom and Dad did not miss that. I will say that it was tough on them, but they loved her and trusted me. I would die for that child. She is almost 15, and we still do things without DD and DSIL. She loves that we leave her parents home once in a while and experience special things together. She says its "our thing". DH surprised the two of us with a long weekend in NYC this summer, complete with awesome meals shows, tours and our favorite hotel. He then took DD and DSIL out to dinner, as he always does if Kady and I are away together. DSIL told him that he thought his precious daughter was so lucky. She had grandparents who adore her, and who make time to be alone with her. He said his own grands, who were millionaires, spent not one minute alone with any of them.

I know it is hard on them when Kady is away, especially my DD. She spends every minute at night with her since DSIL works evenings. They never say no, though because they believe the relationship we have forged is important for their daughter.

I am so stinkin glad I am not related to the OP
 
Child-free woman, here. I don't think I can over-emphasize how COMPLETELY CLASSLESS and out of line it is to EVER question or opine on a woman's decision or ability to have children. "If she wanted to ___ so badly, she'd have kids of her own." Disgusting. I hope she finds out you posted this and you're stuck PAYING for childcare from now on like everyone else does.

Do what you want with your kid, that's your call. But that comment was vile.
 
So my husband and I decided not to let my son go. He can go in a few years with us when his sister is a little bit older. I told my SIL, who was disappointed. She asked us to reconsider, giving the reason that we use her in our place quite frequently so we must trust her. We told her that wasn't the issue. We just don't want him to go without us. She'll get over it and lucky for me, she loves my kids too much so I'll never lose my free and almost always available child care! Lol!

You sister in law does not read the forums, I hope.. ?
or perhaps she is in on the JOKE.. ;)
 
I would let him go. Only because you have taken him before. If it was going to be his first time, then I'd might feel uneasy and want to share that experience.
 
Does this mean that when your child does something cool at school, you will not allow them to go if you can't go too?
There are so many things my kids did things without us that are major memories for them. Trips to Wdw and NOLA with choir were highlights.
 











Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE








DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom