This is the subject of an Fortune magazine article interviewing famed investor Jim Rogers. Here's a blurb from the article (article link posted below).
"Conceivably we could have just had recession, hard times, sliding dollar, inflation, etc., but I'm afraid it's going to be much worse," he says. "Bernanke is printing huge amounts of money. He's out of control and the Fed is out of control. We are probably going to have one of the worst recessions we've had since the Second World War. It's not a good scene."
And you know, nobody wants to believe that it could be *that* bad, but I would say that there's a possibility at this point. I saw an interesting chart today, one that shows our GDP (Gross Domestic Product), or how our economic growth is measured. This chart shows what the GDP would have been without Mortgage Equity Withdrawals. It's amazing....it shows that without mortgage equity our "3 quarter shallow recession in 2001" would have been a 2 *year* recessionary event. And it shows that from 2003-200 we would have had GDP in the 0.25-0.75% range only getting above 1% GDP in 2006. So, we went from one bubble right to the next.
And this comes back to what I've been asking for quite awhile....where do Americans get the money to keep GDP growing as consumer spending now makes up 72% of GDP. We've got the worst credit crisis since the depression, still unfolding. Lending continues to tighten.
Here's that chart of GDP with and without Mortgage equity withdrawals.
http://photos1.blogger.com/hello/243/2888/640/GDPMEW.jpg
And here's the Fortune magazine article:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/30/new...gers.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008013109
"Conceivably we could have just had recession, hard times, sliding dollar, inflation, etc., but I'm afraid it's going to be much worse," he says. "Bernanke is printing huge amounts of money. He's out of control and the Fed is out of control. We are probably going to have one of the worst recessions we've had since the Second World War. It's not a good scene."
And you know, nobody wants to believe that it could be *that* bad, but I would say that there's a possibility at this point. I saw an interesting chart today, one that shows our GDP (Gross Domestic Product), or how our economic growth is measured. This chart shows what the GDP would have been without Mortgage Equity Withdrawals. It's amazing....it shows that without mortgage equity our "3 quarter shallow recession in 2001" would have been a 2 *year* recessionary event. And it shows that from 2003-200 we would have had GDP in the 0.25-0.75% range only getting above 1% GDP in 2006. So, we went from one bubble right to the next.
And this comes back to what I've been asking for quite awhile....where do Americans get the money to keep GDP growing as consumer spending now makes up 72% of GDP. We've got the worst credit crisis since the depression, still unfolding. Lending continues to tighten.
Here's that chart of GDP with and without Mortgage equity withdrawals.
http://photos1.blogger.com/hello/243/2888/640/GDPMEW.jpg
And here's the Fortune magazine article:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/30/new...gers.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008013109
. But they make great topics for conversation, which I enjoy
. I always think about the motivation behind the person saying it. I also take the Larry Kudlowish bullish comments with a huge grain of salt as well. Usually I split the difference, which would in this case mean a 2001-type recession. The world won't end, we'll slow down awhile, and we'll all move on.
(disregard the smilies again. DD really likes them so they go on all my posts)
recession