Well, considering I will be spending 6 mths away from my husband and daughter I will be somewhat picky. While I don't think I deserve 20K, I will not accept $500, it's not worth it to me. It is not easy to do this and my job does not require travel.
The job you were hired for does not require travel however this is clearly not the same job. Though, to be honest it doesn't sound like this job requires travel either, so long as the employee lives near the site.
It is perfectly reasonable IMO to discuss/request a change in compensation for a change in position. They are obviously willing to cover expenses and even bonus dollars so that's a good deal at least in the interim. Ultimately they probably don't want to do that forever, but perhaps they'd help with relocation if it became a permanent position.
Yes, she said it would be paid out at the end of the 6 mths. I *may* request half at 3 mths and half at the end. Whats the worst that could happen? They say no? I'm okay with that.
Sure, there's no risk in asking on this one, but their answer may depend on their motivation for offering the bonus. In addition to our yearly performance bonuses I will often offer retention bonuses to key employees so they stick around for the duration of an important project (or a site consolidation). In that case there's no upside and lots of downside risk to making a mid-period payment. If it's more of a keep someone happy because we want them back when the assignment is done deal then a mid-period payment wouldn't be an issue.
And, I am sure there are lots of people who would want my job. I love my job and work very hard at it. I don't think negotiating a bonus amount is going to put my job in jeopardy. If it would at your employer then I feel sorry for you.
Do you work for a public company? If you do, then it may not matter today but you may be one CEO change away from cost cost containment being king. When you need to drive %15 earnings growth on %5 revenue growth quarter after quarter it doesn't take a math whiz to see where that's heading... When that happens no matter how dedicated an individual employee is it may have zero impact on whether or not he or she will have a job next month.
I have either been given an reasonable explanation of why it was lower than I felt was appropriate, or been given total B.S. - in which case I knew it was time to move on.
Employment is a two-way street. While this recession has made everyone skittish - me included, trust me - you have a right to be compensated fairly for the work you do. Taking on work that other's won't deserves extra compensation.
Yes!
While it stinks that much of corporate America has near zero loyalty for its employees these days, the flip side is that we shouldn't feel any more obligation to a company than it show's to us. Do you think they'd keep your job if they could do it for 20% less overseas? 30%? 50%? At some point if the job was portable the company "would have to move to stay competitive". You should view yourself the same way IMO, if you can make 20% more (or have more vacation, a shorter commute, free schooling, etc.) at some point you need to make sure your employer is "remaining competitive" or move.
Of course if there's 10% unemployment in Indiana, 11% in 3 neighboring states, and 15% in the 4th, competitive may not mean any better pay/benefits
If traveling had been a part of the job to begin with I could see your point. It's not. I had to travel for training, I was told that when I interviewed. Fine, after that, my job does not require travel.
Again, your old job did not require travel. You are no longer in that job. Ask for what you think you need to make this position worth it for you and decide based on what they can do for you.
When you consider your negotiating posture one thing to consider is that apparently there is enough excess staff at your current location to eliminate a full time position for at least half a year. Will they have enough work to justify keeping you if you choose not to fill the remote position?
Wear your management hat when you answer that. Not your immediate manager who loves your work hat, but the senior manager or CFO hat who's trying to pinch every ounce of fat to keep on his/her (perhaps totally unreasonable) budget for the year...
I've seen that scenario happen twice at different employers where a high performance employee went on a short-duration assignment and found he didn't have anywhere to land when it ended in one case, or when he decided he couldn't stand it in the other. Companies do dysfunctional things all the time, and sometimes good employees are caught up in those mistakes.
Another data point - since you've been working so much and away so much, maybe negotiate for an extra week or two of vacation? For me, paid time w/ my family is more valuable than cash. If not - I agree 10% of your salary seem reasonable.
Vacation can be great if you're in a position to be able to use it (can actually take time off work, spouse can take time off, etc.), but it's much less liquid than cash. If this company is so desperate for someone to fill this position and nobody at that site can even cover in the interim how likely is she to be able to use the vacation? Of course if it's really going to be done after 6 months then maybe asking for (and using) a couple extra weeks of vacation once the assignment is complete makes obtaining a large block of consecutive days off easier.