NotUrsula
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2002
- Messages
- 20,038
Oh, I think there is a difference between malapropisms and words made up out of whole cloth. Malapropisms drive me nuts, but I find invented words very interesting.
When I was in junior high school it was common for kids to invent private curse words. Very useful when you really feel frustrated and want to curse, but know that your parents will nail your hide to the wall if you say any of the usual ones out loud. I remember that one that stuck in my little group was "frotch." It wasn't a combination of anything, or a play on words -- it was just a satisfyingly harsh sound that was good for venting annoyance.
There is one category of invented words that does bother me -- "-ize" adaptations. These are almost always forced active-voice versions of verb constructs which English already covers. Examples would be utilize and incentivize. What on earth is wrong with use and encourage?
PS: Some people do have speech problems that make some words just difficult for them. My mother, for instance, could not pronounce a simple tr sound at the beginning of a word. She always somehow added an h. So for her, trailer was thrailer, and trust was thrust.
PPS: It is my understanding that "sped" is derogatory primarily when used to refer to a person or people, or in regard to things (like school buses) which are associated with those people; in that context it is a modernized form of the old "retard". I don't think that it is necessarily derogatory in the context in which the OP used it; as an abbreviation without an adjective implication. I believe that it is rather like "Oriental" -- nasty when you talk about people, fine when you talk about rugs. Context matters.
When I was in junior high school it was common for kids to invent private curse words. Very useful when you really feel frustrated and want to curse, but know that your parents will nail your hide to the wall if you say any of the usual ones out loud. I remember that one that stuck in my little group was "frotch." It wasn't a combination of anything, or a play on words -- it was just a satisfyingly harsh sound that was good for venting annoyance.
There is one category of invented words that does bother me -- "-ize" adaptations. These are almost always forced active-voice versions of verb constructs which English already covers. Examples would be utilize and incentivize. What on earth is wrong with use and encourage?
PS: Some people do have speech problems that make some words just difficult for them. My mother, for instance, could not pronounce a simple tr sound at the beginning of a word. She always somehow added an h. So for her, trailer was thrailer, and trust was thrust.
PPS: It is my understanding that "sped" is derogatory primarily when used to refer to a person or people, or in regard to things (like school buses) which are associated with those people; in that context it is a modernized form of the old "retard". I don't think that it is necessarily derogatory in the context in which the OP used it; as an abbreviation without an adjective implication. I believe that it is rather like "Oriental" -- nasty when you talk about people, fine when you talk about rugs. Context matters.