I believe they did away with the Q&A last year.
Becasue DVC owners are too smart for our own good!! We give them a run for their money.
Well, hoping not to offend anyone in particular, IMO the Q&A had largely morphed into a platform for members to voice their own niche special interests. Every year there were rather mundane questions about certain cable channels not being carried, "why don't we get more discounts?", "why don't people who own a large number of points get better perks?", complaints about bus transportation, room accessibility, decor, etc.
I couldn't help but sense the irony when owners go directly from complaining about costs (dues increases) to wanting additional services added.
And there were also questions from people who just didn't understand the economics of running a hotel / timeshare. 3-4 years ago it was "why are our dues still going up while we're in a recession?" Operating costs associated with property management (union wages, health insurance and other benefits, fuel prices, etc.) typically aren't subject to the impacts of a recession. But there's no effective way to teach Econ 101 in an open forum where they're trying to accommodate dozens of questions in a limited time.
Overall I would have preferred that the Q&A stay. Morbid curiosity, I guess.

But in a sense, I don't blame them for eliminating it. Last year's meeting was less than half as long as the year before. It went from nearly 3 hours down to about 80 minutes.
Disney doesn't like to be questioned in an open forum, most of their answers were generic and non committal. They also don't like confrontation and apparently felt that an owner could become aggressive and unruly due to the fact that they had uniformed security present.
Bill
Some of the answers were generic. Some were also very specific...and informative. I could provide several examples if you wish.
As for the security, if YOU were planning the meeting, would you run it without a security presence? Regardless of how satisfied (or not) the masses are with DVC, there's always the possibility of a confrontation. In the minds of some, it's an adversarial environment similar to a shareholder's meeting.
Much better to have security on-hand than be scrambling to protect attendees if someone with an axe to grind refuses to act in a civil manner.