- Joined
- Apr 29, 2004
- Messages
- 38,651
I absolutely agree. When Disney is almost running year-round discounts in one form or another to get people to stay *on property* it suggests that there are more than enough rooms to satisfy demand.
Originally I agreed with this, which was suggested by several PP's. But then I got to thinking a bit more (always dangerous) and I know disagree with the logic.
It seems to me that people stay on property when the total cost of their vacation is "reasonable" in their minds. If "free dining" is one of the factors that makes it reasonable, then they will stay on property. But, from Disney's perspective as long as they are making a reasonable return on their resort investment (even if they do have to offer "free dining") then all is good. At that point Disney's decision to build a new resort is not about existing resort capacity or occupancy levels, its about what they project for occupancy levels and revenue/expense of the new resort.
In other words, just because Disney is offering free dining to get people to stay on property, it doesn't mean they are losing money (or not making enough money) and therefore shouldn't build more rooms.
