mom2rtk
Invented the term "Characterpalooza"
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2008
- Messages
- 62,831
Correct me I'm wrong, but I think you are saying that someone uses their first FP+ for a headliner at a tiered park, and then hops to an un-tiered park where they can use the other two for headliners instead of being limited to "tier 2" attractions.
Unless all parks do eventually become tiered (which I haven't ruled out), this isn't necessarily a problem. I believe the ONLY reason all parks aren't tiered already is that some of them (theoretically) have enough attractions to allow someone to reserve all three of their FPs for headliners. So, theoretically, it would not be a problem for someone to use two of their slots for headliners at that park, even if they already rode a headliner at another park. They were still limited to only one headliner at the tiered park, where tiering was needed. Does that make sense?
In my example, I was using the 2 tiered parks, DHS and Epcot. In my example one would be hopping for the sheer purpose of circumventing the tiering. They would do TSMM and ToT at DHS then hop to Epcot and ride Soarin. Next day they do RnR and ToT at DHS before hopping to Epcot to do TT.
Of course, Disney could structure it so they did not get tier 1 attractions in both parks. But I think they need to keep this structure as uncomplicated as possible, so would be torn in how to proceed with it.
Didn't you notice that F+ was in the title? Have yet to see an FP+ thread that doesn't end up with a large percentage of theory and speculation. 