Jeff in BigD
Oldschool DISer
- Joined
- Aug 18, 1999
- Messages
- 4,376
I think the thing is this:
When someone says "well in France, they do ___" the other person sometimes hears it as "France is better because they do ___ ". If someone is driving a Ford & always talks about how great features on a Chevy are, after a while wouldn't some people wonder that person's driving a Ford? (& Chevy keeps getting financial aid from Ford, only to compete with them).
There are people that have legitimate gripes, but there are also people that aren't happy unless they're complaining about something.
I'm assuming the debate was in regards to the military as that's where most of the "unAmerican" labels get used. I think a lot of people (even our age) have the image of the anit-War demonstrators as drugged out hippies that throw rocks & spit on Vets. That's a hard pill to swallow & I can't understand how anyone could have done that & still be proud to call themselves a hippie. Also occasionally we'll see another country holding a demonstration, upset about whatever & burning American flags. Those are hard images to erase or get past.
Questioning governmental policy is your right (heaven knows I did a lot of it from 1993-2001) as someone has the right to blindly accept it or agree with it after considering pros & cons.
Finally you have to know the person (meant in general, not someone specifically) you're debating. If they can't discuss things on a purely intellectual level without getting emotional, you might want to avoid future debates with them.
When someone says "well in France, they do ___" the other person sometimes hears it as "France is better because they do ___ ". If someone is driving a Ford & always talks about how great features on a Chevy are, after a while wouldn't some people wonder that person's driving a Ford? (& Chevy keeps getting financial aid from Ford, only to compete with them).
There are people that have legitimate gripes, but there are also people that aren't happy unless they're complaining about something.
I'm assuming the debate was in regards to the military as that's where most of the "unAmerican" labels get used. I think a lot of people (even our age) have the image of the anit-War demonstrators as drugged out hippies that throw rocks & spit on Vets. That's a hard pill to swallow & I can't understand how anyone could have done that & still be proud to call themselves a hippie. Also occasionally we'll see another country holding a demonstration, upset about whatever & burning American flags. Those are hard images to erase or get past.
Questioning governmental policy is your right (heaven knows I did a lot of it from 1993-2001) as someone has the right to blindly accept it or agree with it after considering pros & cons.
Finally you have to know the person (meant in general, not someone specifically) you're debating. If they can't discuss things on a purely intellectual level without getting emotional, you might want to avoid future debates with them.