Buckalew11
2013 1/2 Marathon Finisher!!! Woohoo!!
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2004
- Messages
- 15,714
The school.
I think the school would probably have problems with a boy with long hair also. It might be "properly groomed" for what it is but that does not mean it would under "properly groomed". I do think they should spell it out for parents and kids. Our school has pretty strict hair rules. Off the collar etc. and it is well spelled out.
I'm with P&W on this...that haircut is horrible. When I was in grade school there were twin boys who wore mohawks. When I see a mohawk I still think of "Jimmy and Timmy", LOL. Theirs was ugly too but it looked a whole lot better than this one.
I think the 3 strikes were all for his hair.
I think the school would probably have problems with a boy with long hair also. It might be "properly groomed" for what it is but that does not mean it would under "properly groomed". I do think they should spell it out for parents and kids. Our school has pretty strict hair rules. Off the collar etc. and it is well spelled out.
I'm with P&W on this...that haircut is horrible. When I was in grade school there were twin boys who wore mohawks. When I see a mohawk I still think of "Jimmy and Timmy", LOL. Theirs was ugly too but it looked a whole lot better than this one.
I think the 3 strikes were all for his hair.


And I don't understand why schools feel they need to police something like that. I understand the need for a dress code of some sort, but I feel that dictating how a kid should wear his or her hair is a bit much. I think the argument that it is "distracting" is incredibly weak. It seems to me that the school was the one making a big deal out of it.