jmminarik
Curmudgeon in Training.
- Joined
- May 23, 2001
- Messages
- 1,140
Originally posted by vernon
There are PLENTY of English dishes that are definately a lot more plebian than fish and chips LOL
Not the way I'd cook'm.

-Joe
Originally posted by vernon
There are PLENTY of English dishes that are definately a lot more plebian than fish and chips LOL
I think I'll have the shepherd's pie, thank you....more plebian than fish and chips...
Originally posted by DrTomorrow
I did mean the Outback chain, and, of course, that's in your (humble) opinion. To be honest, I long ago realized that I'm just not one of those folks who feels that there's value in the most expensive of meals. For example: Outback's Victoria Filet (9oz): $18.99 - Shula's Filet(12oz): $38.95. I've had both, and I just can't taste whatever others taste that justifies it costing more than twice as much for 3 oz more. Recently had dinner in Las Vegas with epicurian friends (American Bar and Grill, Rio) and the menu offered two kinds of steaks - Black Angus, and something called "Dry Aged" (news to me, my friend had heard of it) - "Dry Aged" cost $10-15 more for the same size of the same cut. We paid the premium, and while my friend waxed poetically that this was the best steak he'd ever had, to me it didn't taste that much better than Outback (or Lone Star, or Logan's Roadhouse, etc....) [Note: Had KOBE beef on that trip, too - also highly over-rated]. So when the entrees start hitting the heights of $30, $40, $50 and up, I head the other way.
IMHO - YMMV
Originally posted by mb168
They can't see why anyone would pay anymore than you do for a Sizzler or Golden Corral steak, even if I was the one paying.