OK, I don't get it...
They do away with the waiting list, which means that Guides now need to check daily for available points to help satisfy members. As I understand it, the idea was that if the points weren't available right away, the member doesn't get the add-on.
But, if I REALLY wanted an add-on, I'd simply call my guide every day and ask him/her to check again. More than anything, this sounds like it's creating a lot more work for the Guides.
I realize they want to sell more SSR and that add-ons probably aren't profitable for DVC. But it seems like all they've created is mass chaos.
If DVC stops exercising ROFR, then they are going to start running short of people wanting to pay $95 per point at SSR--even with the extra 12 years. Unless they are starting to market to recent college graduates, the DVC I contracts would still take the youngest of us well into our 60s.
I could see them trying to de-emphasize DVC I in another decade or so, but I think it's still much too early for that.
Can anyone make sense out of this other than categorizing it as a "philosophical decision"??? Am I missing something?
They do away with the waiting list, which means that Guides now need to check daily for available points to help satisfy members. As I understand it, the idea was that if the points weren't available right away, the member doesn't get the add-on.
But, if I REALLY wanted an add-on, I'd simply call my guide every day and ask him/her to check again. More than anything, this sounds like it's creating a lot more work for the Guides.
I realize they want to sell more SSR and that add-ons probably aren't profitable for DVC. But it seems like all they've created is mass chaos.
If DVC stops exercising ROFR, then they are going to start running short of people wanting to pay $95 per point at SSR--even with the extra 12 years. Unless they are starting to market to recent college graduates, the DVC I contracts would still take the youngest of us well into our 60s.
I could see them trying to de-emphasize DVC I in another decade or so, but I think it's still much too early for that.
Can anyone make sense out of this other than categorizing it as a "philosophical decision"??? Am I missing something?