We bought at VGC which expires in 2060, at which point I will be dead, so I don't care. Our plans are to use DVC until we can't travel any more, then sell on the resell market. I doubt our children will be interested in DVC or able to afford the yearly maintenance.
Perhaps, perhaps not, the article really doesn't state that it was never planned or considered. But it does also state that the rooms settled. Structures do have a practical useful life.
I didn't get any maybe out of it when I read. If there was a plan to remove them, I believe they would have had a plan that did not require them to be permanently enclosed by the exterior walls and balconies.
"they were permanently enclosed in the structure by exterior walls and balconies."
i'm always amazed (and amused) when this topic comes up and you get the predictable posts saying related to being too old to care or being deceased. Personally, i'd rather have a meaningful discussion of what such issues will mean to those that do care at the time. Many of those affected will be our kids and grandkids.
Unfortunately, history suggests that most such products get worse over time rather than better but I share your dream. Generally it's 1 step forward and 2 steps back at each turn. The other issue, which I hinted at above, is that IF they don't figure out a way to convince most then owners to extend is that dues for those remaining members are likely to be VERY high. For a system that's already 20-30% above comparable options, that's scary.I think DVC is a great product, however, I hope between now and 2042 they can come up with something even better.
I like to see things constantly improve and with that kind of time on their hands you would think they could come up with a new program that is even better.
Jason
Or Assisted Living units, I wouldn't mind living close to my happy place at 69!
Unfortunately, history suggests that most such products get worse over time rather than better but I share your dream. Generally it's 1 step forward and 2 steps back at each turn. The other issue, which I hinted at above, is that IF they don't figure out a way to convince most then owners to extend is that dues for those remaining members are likely to be VERY high. For a system that's already 20-30% above comparable options, that's scary.
Obviously, but then what. What was convert? I believe it was rumored to be about 30%. Assume with ROFR and other changes over time it move up to 50% of the points by late in the game for the 2042 ending. DVD and Disney are still stuck what what to do with the resort and it's rooms. Certainly they have a lot of potential options but all of them are fraught with problems.I would think that those points, and their associated dues responsibilities would fall back to Disney. They would be responsible for paying the 2042-2057 portion of the dues for the points they own.
Obviously, they would just use the points to sell rooms at retail.
Can anyone say condos? Think of how much cash Disney could generate by turning stand alone DVC resorts into condos.
They will make the decision that makes business sense as they should.Hopefully, they will offer to the owner or inherited family members before Disney takes over. It would be the "family thing" to do.
I'm in for the condo idea. I know that when we reach retirement age we plan to be living as close to WDW as possible. I also know that I can't afford their new high end community, but I could definitely swing the condo.