The Green Monster
Earning My Ears
- Joined
- May 10, 2017
- Messages
- 11
Just learned about this change for Pirates. So sad that this part of the ride is changing. Whats next? Shaving of the hairy leg?! Smh
Please, let's not add a leg wax scene to pirates!Just learned about this change for Pirates. So sad that this part of the ride is changing. Whats next? Shaving of the hairy leg?! Smh
That might surprise some of the people who want the redhead turned into a pirate herself, so she can be some kind of role model.I don't think pirates are supposed to be nice people.
It's a ride folks.
I don't see why we cannot apply the "Would it be done today?" test to things like this. For example, suppose there was no NFL team in Washington DC and the NFL just awarded the city an expansion franchise. The franchise had to submit a proposed team name to the league office. Would they ever consider submitting "Redskins" as an option and even if they did, would the league ever accept it? The whole idea is ridiculous. So why is it ridiculous to think that the league should make them change it now? Same here. If PoC did not exist and was being built today, would Disney include a scene where women were being sold into bridal slavery with several of them in tears? The idea of this is ridiculous. So if it wouldn't be built today, why is the idea of deleting that scene so wrong? I suppose I could be persuaded in the other direction if someone could demonstrate that kidnapping women and selling them at auction is an historically accurate depiction of what pirates actually did. But there is no evidence of that. So if the ride is going to depict made-up scenes for fun and laughter (which it absolutely should...there is no intent here to be historically accurate and that is fine), then the made-up scenes should be fun and laughable. Few people can find sexual slavery funny.
Oh. And in answer to the question...I am not "bothered by the scene" but I agree with the decision to change it. I don't get bothered by too much at amusement parks.
I completely agree. It's a ride. Just a ride. So I see making a change to it as absolutely no big deal. I'm not going to get in a twist because an amusement park decides to make a change to a ride it owns and operates. It's a non-issue.
I don't think they would include a scene with women to be auctioned off nowadays. But I do think a tavern scene with scantily clad women would be very possible...
What I find confusing is that it's the same folks who often scream "family values!" that are bemoaning the loss of a scene depicting women being sold into sexual slavery.
As i said, im still going to enjoy the ride and it won't stop me from having a great time.
But this was done because of a PC complaint. So fine you changed this ride, but where does it end? Is there a point where you aren't afraid to say that you aren't going to make a change?
But this was done because of a PC complaint. So fine you changed this ride, but where does it end? Is there a point where you aren't afraid to say that you aren't going to make a change?