Disney wants to make money. People with more disposable income will spend more money, in general, because they have more of it to spend. There's nothing wrong with a business targeting specific demographic groups.Kind of feeling lately that WDW wants only a certain type of visitor. Those with a very high income --- It's getting really really $$$$$ and there aren't many rooms that are discounted or tickets or food options.
? wrong? I hope I am.
Kind of feeling lately that WDW wants only a certain type of visitor. Those with a very high income --- It's getting really really $$$$$ and there aren't many rooms that are discounted or tickets or food options.
? wrong? I hope I am.
Kind of feeling lately that WDW wants only a certain type of visitor. Those with a very high income --- It's getting really really $$$$$ and there aren't many rooms that are discounted or tickets or food options. ? wrong? I hope I am.
I don't think it is about income at all. It is about overall approach to the trip. I think Disney is trying to shift back towards the "once in a lifetime" crowd that will spend freely, even if they have to save for years to do so, and away from us regulars who want the best deals on our room and dining and don't buy much of the overpriced merchandise or add-on experiences. Annual passholders, DVC members, and other frequent guests simply aren't as profitable as a family coming for a once-in-a-lifetime trip full of $15 balloons and $100 Bibbidi Bobbidi Boutique visits and $30 t-shirts to remember it all by.
Do you know many businesses whose goal is to help the low income spend less money at their establishment? Not just "we have a public statement that we are for the little guy" but businesses that truly want people to come, use their amenities and spend less money? It's not a charity. They have customers spending the money so there is no reason to slash prices especially because it would lessen the experience, driving away those with the money to spend. If they cut prices to the guy with less to spend, it's not like the wealthy are going to come in droves to be overcharged to compensate it. Even something like Sav-a-lot- they cut their prices because they have a model of keeping the price low, not advertising, not decorating, no extras and because they charge less you buy more. They don't cut their price in the hopes that only extremely poor people come in and buy one item each. It's not about the little guy. They expect that you still spend $50, but then you love them because they built their business around the idea that they can bulk order and cut just the right way to keep the same % of that $50 while you take more home. Even if it sounds great at first, I don't think we really want Disney in on that charge less philosophy. The MK would turn into a parking lot with some people in costumes and $1 admission... not quite the same experience, but they cater to the poor, so it's ok, right?
Kind of feeling lately that WDW wants only a certain type of visitor. Those with a very high income --- It's getting really really $$$$$ and there aren't many rooms that are discounted or tickets or food options.
? wrong? I hope I am.
If Disney really wanted only the 'exclusive' clientele, there wouldn't be quick service dining, there wouldn't be value resorts, there wouldn't be any discounts and the prices would be even higher.
And to piggy back onto this... You can book a package with Disney that only requires a $200 deposit and has to be paid off 45 days before arrival. If you book a year out you can make payments on it, interest free as long as it's paid in full 45 before your check in date. That seems to help people who aren't "exclusive" guests make the vacation affordable.
But remember that if you buy multi-day tickets you get a better discount. And there's places like undercover tourist that have discounted multi-day tickets too. There's always a way to help make things more affordable. Yes, even discounted tickets are expensive but every little bit helps.the one day ticket price is now close to $100. A family of just four going for just a few days even offsite... $$$$$$.
While I do agree that there are many ways to make it affordable, I do get the feeling Disney is trying to keep a certain perception. They want a Disney vacation to seem more like a luxury, or an exclusive destination. Otherwise it starts to look like an ordinary tourist trap, and it loses its luster.
Coincidentally, there was a segment on my local radio station about things that give the impression today that someone is affluent vs. things in the 80s. One of the things discussed from the 80s was a Disney vacation. When I was a kid, I didn't know of anyone who went to Disney. Then my sister went on her honeymoon in 1980. It was a huge deal. Now everyone wants to go, and many people do. I have personally been 5 times in 8 years. In order to keep the perception of a premiere destination, Disney has to make it kind of difficult to go cheaply.
I also agree that the big discounts came after 9/11 and the downturn in the economy. Now that things have picked back up, the discounts are not as plentiful. When I get a chance, I will post a pic of the pool at Allstar Sports in June on a nice day. it is practically empty.
And to piggy back onto this... You can book a package with Disney that only requires a $200 deposit and has to be paid off 45 days before arrival. If you book a year out you can make payments on it, interest free as long as it's paid in full 45 before your check in date. That seems to help people who aren't "exclusive" guests make the vacation affordable.
I think the relative cost of travel has a lot to do with it. In the 1980s air travel was about 30% higher than it is today (adjusted for inflation etc). Before deregulation it was even higher. Also has was relatively more expensive and the cars had lower mpgs. When I grew up (because I'm ancient in my mid 30s) people didn't fly places. No Europe, no California, no Disney. It was simply too expensive for a family to do that. Now it's relatively inexpensive so traveling with you family anywhere is an option.