rodkenrich
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2001
- Messages
- 863
,
That would make a lot of sense, if there was some other means of enforcing non-transferability, such as biometrics, perhaps.Frankly, I was imagining a card worn around the neck like many other IDs.
I wouldn't be so sure that they'd value some guests' antipathy for bracelets as much as you seem to think they will. They already use bracelets to secure some restricted services; it is a great means of doing so because the bracelet can be made such that an attempt to transfer it from the person for whom the services associated with the ID were sold to another person would be more readily evident, and therefore the bracelet approach is somewhat less subject to abuse by guests. As times goes on, it has become clear that some consumers are intent on escalating their efforts to extract more from product and service providers than they paid for, and so asset protection will continue to increase in priority.
That would make a lot of sense, if there was some other means of enforcing non-transferability, such as biometrics, perhaps.
That is a good point.There is a difference between a special event and a week long stay in terms of using a bracelet
Children are already required to wear a bracelet on both Disney and RCCL with their muster station. They are not allowed to take it off all week. Mine always kept it on even though she did not like wearing it. What they do with parents that don't agree I do not know. My point being Disney has used the bracelet in a different way before with guests. For DD it had her name our name cabin number and muster station. No credit card info - I would personally not have liked that! We don't allow DD to have charging on her KTTW either.