The article (and I'm referring to the full article, not the soundbite within another article published in the Sun), does say he was sent home because he did not have the necessary Visa. The article doesn't explain why he needed a Visa, but let's assume it's correct. It doesn't follow that those DISers who have posted here recently also need one. My objective has always been to provide practical advice to those DISers on an subject about which I have some knowledge. I find it extremely frustrating and, frankly, offensive, that anyone would persist in pontificating on the matter. To repeatedly quote what is stated on the US Immigration website, with no actual knowledge of how that is interpreted or in what circumstances it is enforceable, is not helpful for those seeking advice to genuine concerns. By all means, express an opinion once, but have the intelligence to know when to let it go.