UKDEB said:
Interesting. Dh and I have just been wondering quite why anyone would get into it in Orlando these days. From what I can gather, it's rare to make a business case for it. There's still money to be made from a capital gains point of view (although not nearly as much as if you'd bought a couple of years ago), but the rental market has to be a mug's game.
Don't know what the fed reserve rate is at the moment, but if you've got a $2M mortgage, surely you must be paying 5% (including a margin). That's $100K a year in interest only, never mind capital repayments and maintenance. Water, air con, lighting, pool cleaning, management fees...
I'm a banker - I have an interest in these things!
that's what i was saying about the saturation point....
although we have a friend in the real estate investment business who just moved to florida a year ago because the market there is so hot...but not orlando...the atlantic coast area....
it's funny, because it was hot for years and then went bust....and bust in a big big way.....but apparently it's recovered....or so he claims.....
as for orlando....i don't know the market and would never want to get involved in something that is so potentially overbuilt....(besides which, i hate orlando.....we only go there for WDW.....in fact we would never go to florida at all if not for WDW....i've never been a fan of florida....although i wouldn't mind living in WDW.....my ideal job: work in WDW and live nearby....and if i lived nearby i would probably look into real estate simply because that is what we have always done wherever we live......)
regarding this house....
let's see....i agree with you......
so if the financing is $100,000/year...
and if they charge on average about $3000/ week (including the pool heating charge), and they rent every week that would give them about $150,000.....
only leaving $50,000 above the mortgage for the other costs and possible profit...
of what you mentioned, water's cheap, but electricity's probably quite expensive.....and i would assume the management fees aren't cheap either....
and that was assuming that they rent out 100% of the time which i'm sure is not anything approaching reality....
so why do they do it?....for the tax loss?....cockeyed optimism?...
i forgot one thing....mortgage costs are tax deductible.....most of that $100,000 would be deductible.....so if this person is high income in his real job, then the $100,000 is reduced by the tax advantage of the deduction...quite a huge sum of money, assuming he's high income (which he would have to be to be able to afford this little gambit)...
so if he's in the 48% bracket, that would be $48,000 less in taxes he would have to pay.....so the mortgage would only really cost him $52,000.....
hmmm.....