justmestace
<br><img src="http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis-sponsor/i
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2002
- Messages
- 26,975
Quite a while back, there was some discussion about underwater cameras, their performance, the best film, etc.
We just returned from Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles (by Aruba), and I tested several different cameras/films.
I used a Kodak disposable, a Fuji disposable (both with no flash) and Target's reusable underwater 35mm with flash.
The results?? Each of the cameras took good pictures only if there was a lot of sun, and the fish I wanted a shot of was in a white sandy area. Even the flash didn't help much on cloudy days, and against a darker setting, such as coral or rock.
To get truly good underwater pictures, I have decided that I will have to buy a really good ($$) camera. On land, each of these took good pictures, I didn't see a difference in quality or color.
Just sharing my own non-scientific study!
We just returned from Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles (by Aruba), and I tested several different cameras/films.
I used a Kodak disposable, a Fuji disposable (both with no flash) and Target's reusable underwater 35mm with flash.
The results?? Each of the cameras took good pictures only if there was a lot of sun, and the fish I wanted a shot of was in a white sandy area. Even the flash didn't help much on cloudy days, and against a darker setting, such as coral or rock.
To get truly good underwater pictures, I have decided that I will have to buy a really good ($$) camera. On land, each of these took good pictures, I didn't see a difference in quality or color.
Just sharing my own non-scientific study!