Laugh O. Grams said:BTW, the writer's problem with his resort was they booked him into Saratoga Springs, while it was still under construction, and didn't feel it that important to mention it. The writer also paid for an upgraded room and was not put into the room his reservation guarenteed!
I'm paraphrasing here because I don't have the article in front of me, but the author didn't say he paid for an upgrade he said that he wanted a room with the sleeping arrangements that were "guaranteed" to him. Unfortunately he doesn't elaborate, so the reader is left to wonder what exactly what was guaranteed and who made the guarantee.
When he complained to the front desk to complain, they only gave him $100. Luckily, when he returned home, he called upper management and they refunded the entire cost of his resort stay.
Again, going from memory, the author indicated that the room situation was resolved. The $100 credit was offered due to "other issues" that arose during the stay. Again, no specifics. He further goes on to claim that "travel industry experts" claim he should have been due a refund for the entire night's stay. However, the reader (at least THIS reader) is left to wonder about the validity of that particular claim since we don't know what the problems were or the identities of these experts.
The most legitimate complaint I see about the resort concerns the ongoing construction. But even that topic is mentioned as almost a footnote. No comments on how it detracted from his trip. Was it merely an eyesore or did he awaken to the sound of groaning trucks each morning?
We also don't know where to place blame for this particular issue. The construction has been ongoing since the resort opened well over a year ago. If his trip was booked through WDTC/CRO, then I absolutely agree they should have said something. But if he booked through AAA or another TA, I don't see what Disney could have done to address that particular concern.
I'm not blind to some of the criticisms within the article, but it was a poorly written piece IMO that is not representative of the experiences of tens-of-thousands of guests staying at Disney resorts on a DAILY basis.
Citing informational sources that were over a year old didn't help either. Rather that quoting a 2004 article in the Orlando Sentinel about maintenance issues, why didn't the author provide his own commentary on the topic? 15 months is an awful lot of time to address peeling paint and dirty bathrooms.
Yes, the author presented both positive and negative viewpoints. For that I give him credit. But it sure seems like the (very limited) quotes and scenarios presented were carefully chosen to suit the author's chosen motivation for writing the piece.