eandesmom
I'm with Beast
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2009
- Messages
- 14,172
We do have an anticipated time that is over a minute per mile different. It is just that an expected finish of 1:32 and and expected finish of 1:46 Don't seem like all that different to me. AND as far as corral placement. It probably will mean only a corral difference. (maybe 2 depending on if one of us gets bumped) I think the cut off for B last year was 1:30 (so I would be C unless bumped up) Cut off for C I think was 1:45 (so if he did get bumped it could be C for him as well) My thought is we are likely both to be in C.
Yeah I can see where it might feel that way, that one minute gets a little shorter when it's a 10 miler I guess. It really does depend on who registers though as to where that break is. Fun to guess but a 14 min difference in finish time is significant even if it doesn't feel like it based on Disney corrals. To put it in perspective, Jeff would come in at about a 1:18 estimated finish and I'd be at 1:30 based on our current POT's which is only a 12 min difference. In reality I'd personally expect to come in more like 1:34-1:43 depending on the heat and humidity

I am getting there. I think that I have to accept that at some point I will slow. I just didn't think it would be before I turned 50
Well, continuous improvement isn't never ending, sadly. At least not in huge leaps and bounds without additional effort. I sure wish it was (speaking for me of course lol). And you aren't slowing, you just are maybe not getting much faster.
I have felt this from the start of my running. I feel as though forcing someone who is over 40 to change their biomechanics isn't a good thing. I have been moving this way for this long... this is natural to me. It is why my one "real" injury (the peroneal tendonitis) came as a result of stability shoes forcing me into a different strike than what was normal for me. (plus I think I tend to supinate a tad and only overpronate in certain shoes)
Jeff and I have had this conversation several times. I am of the school of thought that everyone should run however their body is built to run. He is an engineer. Who fully believes in heel striking as the most efficient load mechanism. From an engineering perspective of course

yep, I think someone told me it is like 30 seconds because it seems to me that I calculated that an 11:30 pace would not be out of the realm of possibility if it were 80 or so. Which stinks! But..given how warm it was on Tuesday I could totally see why. I did not run in the highest of the day, but wow...even earlier it was warm and I did feel like my energy was being sucked out of me in order to fuel the rising heat in the air.
After yesterday, I'm going with the 30 seconds. BLEH.

I am not sure what has been up with the humidity here. I check each morning when I go out and it is always up over 70% if not closer to 100%.
Early morning is usually high, I actually think that's pretty normal for here in the summer
I think the "excusing" is part of my trouble too. So while I look for a concrete reason for my pace I suspect that it really is more due to that mental game.
I know it is. I definitely "excused" yesterday. True. It was hot. My legs were chafing. My bunion hurt.
Still excuses. I didn't have to walk a couple of times, or take a bio break. I chose to. Did it stay within the "easy pace" that McMillan would have me at? Yes. Did I really need it to be that easy? Or was I just copping out, being a little bit lazy, a little bit unmotivated, knowing I was well within the range that I am supposed to be for an easy run as well as a long run, telling myself that I'm pushing the miles, no need to push pace too? There's the real question. Excuses. Well except maybe not wanting my legs to actually bleed, I did slow a couple of times just to let them rest and hopefully cool a little and avoid actual skin tear. But the reality is my legs felt fine the whole time, outside of the chafing. I mentally wasn't quite 100% there. That's what it comes down to for me and I need to somehow get past that. I fear somehow it will be easy for me to decide to walk a little at the half, to take a bio break even if I don't truly need to, that it's not supposed to be a PR race for most (though regardless of course, it will be for me) and I'll cop out under the guise of the "experience". If that makes any sense.
As for if it hurt you...mattered.yeah, I am with you. I am not sure. In the end you ran an incredible race and took home a price in your division. That is something to definitely celebrate. However when you start to second guess and realize you may have even been able to due better... or better yet when you KNOW you could do better that is when it really does start to be a question of if it mattered or not. Course, in the end I suppose it only matters if it matters to you regardless of how well or poor you did.
I am not sure I've had a race where I didn't "know" I could do better. If I have it would be that first 10K. There is almost always something that could be improved. Sometimes quite minor and sometimes less so.
Last year, they were paused. So the time and miles stopped while I got my drink or took my potty break. I kinda feel like you are right. I mean... those pauses gave my body a chance to "recharge" and so I do not know it is fair to compare one time to another.
I've started leaving all my pauses and breaks in. While I may not like the numbers, at the end of the day it feels a little more honest to me. The only time I'll adjust is for a stoplight. That's not a race condition.
I would really like to think that I will do 100 a month from now until January 1. However, it is a bit crazy. While I have the halfs that will take my miles up... I also have a lot of tapers in there. So I could see that being a challenge. we will see though.![]()
100 also doesn't give much chance for recovery, tapers aside! IF I stick to my plan (and I expect I will even if I whine a little lol), I'll come in at 81 for July and 89 for August.

Railroad days does look like fun, Jeff wasn't into driving up there but you never know, I need to re-look at it. Only other think we are considering is Torchlight.
So guess what? We finally have a plan of who is going.
When I first formed the notion of this trip in my head I really thought it would just be Steve, Zoe and myself. Then I was made to realize that there was a small problem with this plan.
What to do with Miss Zoe while Steve and I are at the race??!! I kinda feel like she is almost to a point where leaving her sleeping in the room would have been ok. Well maybe in another year or two.maybe 3. She will be just weeks shy of 10 when we are there in January.
The question became who.
Who did we know who could afford the airfare (we didn't want that added cost), could chip in their own spending money (again we didn't want that cost), had that time available (vacation time or school can certainly get in the way of fun), was not a huge person (we will be in a studio and having 2 boys who are like bulls in a china shop constantly - it would be nice to have a small person who we wouldn't be tripping over constantly), was not prone to eating the amount required for a small army (again see "didn't want added cost" comment), who would appreciate going (I will explain how that factors in) and who would WANT to go (shocking as it may sound not everyone wants to take a trip to Disney).
After going down our list we quickly decided that many of our family members would be out for one reason or another. This made us think of our nieces. We have 5 total none of whom have been to Disney and 4 of whom are all of babysitting age.
My brother's daughter fell off the list because I rarely speak to my brother and have not seen her since well before her dad and mom got divorced. (maybe as much as 10 years ago?)
Steve's brother has 3 girls total. 2 are older than Zoe. The "appreciate" came into play here. The oldest will graduate in 2015 from high school so my first thought was that this would be a great way to celebrate that. However, there is baggage there that needs not going into a long story over. Suffice it to say two things caused not only the older one but the next one to fall off our list. Both are things that are the fault of the parents and not the girls. Entitlement and Reciprocity. Both parents feel as though things should be given to them. (side tmi rant.. yes, they "needed" to get all new furniture for their home..like the entire home.. got fil to cosign on a loan and then never made payments so now fil is paying for their furniture. Steve's sister.. she took out a second mortgage on her home so bil could have health coverage and other things for his family... so yes, they are over the top entitled) So we knew that if we offered for one they would be upset if we didn't offer to take all of them. Also I personally am a bit petty regarding starting to give anything to their kids. I used to. I use to be a good aunt that sent them stuff all the time. However nothing came to my kids... not even for christmas. So when Kira graduated and then later got married and there was not even a card...yep, I am petty. At that point I cut things back just to Christmas presents. (even though they still send nothing and never say thank you)
I can relate to this. We really really struggled with this regarding my nephew that did not make the NYE trip. We offered food and room and park ticket. All my brother and/or his ex needed to come up with was flight and spending money. And they couldn't/wouldn't. It is their choice but grr it made me mad. At the same time none of us wanted to feed the problem...the problem of him expecting everyone else to pay for stuff while he spends his money on (what we see as) less important things.
14 is a really lovely age actually. Old enough to take the job seriously but still really enjoy Disney. And young enough that missing school (middle school I assume) is really not an issue for a few days. This will be a very special trip for her!