Is it my imangination, or has the definition of "middle class" changed? Since when does middle class mean designer labels and $4 daily lattes and 3500 sqft homes with gormet kitchens (that go un-used because the family eats out 2 out of 3 meals a day).
DH and I make about $100k combined, pre tax. In this part of IL, it doesn't get you far. Comfortable sure, but nothing like the lifestyle these people tried (and failed) to buy for themselves. We live in a 60 year old 1300 sqft fixer upper on a postage sized lot, have two cars (only one with a loan) no kids and are getting by, but don't have much left over. We don't buy clothes or things for the house (other than nessesary repairs and remodeling), we don't travel much (the Disney trips in my sig have been just about the only trips I've made in the past 10 years, and those were heavily discounted since I work as a
travel agent). Our biggest extravigance is eating out (very bad habit that we've tried and failed to correct, we're trying again right now! Hey, we're not perfect.) but otherwise we really don't spend friviously. Even our wedding cost 1/2 the area average!
But DH often says that he feels like a failure because we don't have that big fancy house in a good school district and three fancy cars, that we can't afford for me not to work once we have kids, can't afford to take a huge vacation every year, can't afford to buy all the stuff we want at the mall. I know better, but DH feels like he isn't providing for me (not that I ask him to!). I keep telling him that this kind of lifestyle ISN'T middle class, or even upper middle class, it's really a lower UPPER class lifestyle. But we are all shown/told via movies and tv that this is now "average". And easy credit makes it look obtainable, but it's really all a mirage.
I just don't get it. I don't get the
scale of it, the sheer numbers of people who sacrifice their future financial security for the material wants of today.