Taylor and Bailey are just about 2 1/2 (amazing!). Taylor has gone through a long struggle with constipation. After pushing the issue, I got a referal to a GI. At Taylor's 1st appt, the x-ray showed her to be impacted. She was put on Miralax, a fiber suppliment, we had to give her an enema (fun times) and she was sent for blood work.
The Miralax has been working but we've had trouble achieving a balance between having trouble going and been loose. The blood work cam back clean/normal...no Celiac's, no lead problems, no thyroid issues and clean bio-chem results (whatever that means).
At the follow up appt, we went over the blood work and then the doctor switched gears and really harped on Taylor's weight. Taylor only weighs 22 lbs. She is not on the chart. The doctor was very condesending when telling me that she considers Taylor to malnourished and that she was listing Taylor as Failure to grow. When I asked what we were concerned about (meaning..what could be causing this..not why was this a problem), the doctor got snippy and said that if she didn't get the proper nutrients she could have stunted growth and stunted brain development...and she said this like I was stupid. She gave me some calorie boosting powder to add to her food and recommended pediasure (which neither of the girls seem to like).
Here's the thing...Taylor has never been on the growth charts. She was born at 4.5 lbs. Her pediatrician said that it could take 5 yrs for her to jump onto the charts. He has never been concerned because her head circumference is in the 50th percentile and, at least up through her 2 yr appt (our last well visit...of course, that was 5 months ago) her curve has paralleled the normal growth curve (even though she is under the line for 5th percentile). Plus she (and Bailey) have hit every developmental milestone well ahead of normal. Hell, they are 2 and they talk in 7-8 word sentences, they know all their shapes, count to 10, sing full songs and have wonderful cooperative play for their age. Also, at birth Taylor was 1.5 lbs smaller than BAiley and 1 inch shorter. At 2 yrs old, Taylor was 1.25 lbs lighter than Bailey and still 1 inch shorter.
I'm not sure how worried I should be. This GI was quite caught up on this, but she only has a small picture to look at. She has only seen Taylor twice and those 2 visits were only 6 weeks apart. I did try to tell her that Taylor was never on the charts but that didn't seem to phase her. On one hand, it's not like Taylor suddenly dropped off the charts. On the other hand, what if the reason she was small to begin with is because there is something wrong? If that was the case, though, would her development be so normal and what about Bailey (her identical twin).
I should add that both girls eat pretty well. Bailey eats more than Taylor. There have been times I wished Taylor would eat more but then there are times she devours food. She also eats a nice variety. I guess being babies # 4 and 5, I stopped being too stressed out over each meal. It seemed to me that over the course of a day/week, both girls were eating ok.
Any thoughts would be appreciated....thanks.
Jess
The Miralax has been working but we've had trouble achieving a balance between having trouble going and been loose. The blood work cam back clean/normal...no Celiac's, no lead problems, no thyroid issues and clean bio-chem results (whatever that means).
At the follow up appt, we went over the blood work and then the doctor switched gears and really harped on Taylor's weight. Taylor only weighs 22 lbs. She is not on the chart. The doctor was very condesending when telling me that she considers Taylor to malnourished and that she was listing Taylor as Failure to grow. When I asked what we were concerned about (meaning..what could be causing this..not why was this a problem), the doctor got snippy and said that if she didn't get the proper nutrients she could have stunted growth and stunted brain development...and she said this like I was stupid. She gave me some calorie boosting powder to add to her food and recommended pediasure (which neither of the girls seem to like).
Here's the thing...Taylor has never been on the growth charts. She was born at 4.5 lbs. Her pediatrician said that it could take 5 yrs for her to jump onto the charts. He has never been concerned because her head circumference is in the 50th percentile and, at least up through her 2 yr appt (our last well visit...of course, that was 5 months ago) her curve has paralleled the normal growth curve (even though she is under the line for 5th percentile). Plus she (and Bailey) have hit every developmental milestone well ahead of normal. Hell, they are 2 and they talk in 7-8 word sentences, they know all their shapes, count to 10, sing full songs and have wonderful cooperative play for their age. Also, at birth Taylor was 1.5 lbs smaller than BAiley and 1 inch shorter. At 2 yrs old, Taylor was 1.25 lbs lighter than Bailey and still 1 inch shorter.
I'm not sure how worried I should be. This GI was quite caught up on this, but she only has a small picture to look at. She has only seen Taylor twice and those 2 visits were only 6 weeks apart. I did try to tell her that Taylor was never on the charts but that didn't seem to phase her. On one hand, it's not like Taylor suddenly dropped off the charts. On the other hand, what if the reason she was small to begin with is because there is something wrong? If that was the case, though, would her development be so normal and what about Bailey (her identical twin).
I should add that both girls eat pretty well. Bailey eats more than Taylor. There have been times I wished Taylor would eat more but then there are times she devours food. She also eats a nice variety. I guess being babies # 4 and 5, I stopped being too stressed out over each meal. It seemed to me that over the course of a day/week, both girls were eating ok.
Any thoughts would be appreciated....thanks.
Jess