jcemom
Official Tag Fairy Assistant
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 8,870
I don't think it's completely impossible to understand. I do think they could word it more clearly.It may be confusing but I don't think it's completely impossible to understand. I mean, obviously a kid's meal is a complete meal. They list the drink in it and everything. Nobody's arguing that the drink is part of the entree because of the way it's worded. No one's saying that you should get the meal as stated w/drink, sides, etc. plus another drink. So why the argument about the extra dessert?
As for the drink being included... the menus do state choice of drink, or something like that. It makes it clear that the drink is included. They don't really mention anything about dessert, while the DDP literature clearly mentions a dessert. I can see how some people may read that as their child gets a meal, with a drink, PLUS a dessert.
Is it completely impossible to understand? Nope. Might it be confusing, easily misinterpreted, whatever? Yes, I can see how it might. I don't think it should have to be explained. It sure be more clear, more precise, in the first place so that it does not require an explanation. JMO, of course.
I do understand how it works and always have. It's never been the least bit confusing to me, but then I spend far too much time on sites like the DIS, LOL.

Glad you had a good trip in spite of a couple snafus



My kids are 10,5,4, and almost 3 (in 2mths) and DH is almost never home for dinner....I don't even sit down for most meals, I hover and play waitress.