Kerry1957
Will run for Hefeweizen
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2017
- Messages
- 1,079
The trail runs can be brutal with a cart!I can imagine pushing that shopping cart would get annoying after a few miles…
;-)
The trail runs can be brutal with a cart!I can imagine pushing that shopping cart would get annoying after a few miles…
;-)
How would cadence be related to HR (I assume you mean a heart monitor chest strap)?
I would think that cadence would be quite accurate with almost any exercise device, especially when running. Yes, the accelerometer (that is, the watch) is on your arm, so maybe it's most affected by your arm, but as long as you're swinging your arm naturally with your running, then your arms and legs will have the same cadence.
When running, cadence is often the dominant rhythm just because that's what your whole body is moving for. That's one reason why wrist-measuring HR monitors have the "cadence locking" problem where they fail to measure your HR and instead lock on to the dominant pattern the watch is feeling: your cadence.
Now, if you're running while pushing a stroller or otherwise don't have your arms moving naturally, then I can see where the watch might have some problems. However, you're still thumping up and down in the cadence rhythm due to the running.
This is why I use my playlists. I'll come back and edit in a chart, but my run cadence section of my interval is pretty much a flat line when I'm using music and not watching a movie. And I've used that tempo of playlist for long enough that it's almost automatic on my easy runs now.Forgive me if this is obvious, or if fancier devices than mine can sort it out in more detail, but my issue with cadence tracking is that it’s fairly useless if you do run/walk intervals because it just takes an average of the two. I find an easier and more accurate measure to be counting every other step during an interval and multiplying by 2 to get steps per minute. I just do that every once in a while to see where I’m at. But I’m also not big on data collection lol! (Says she who never saves any run on her Garmin, and mostly bought the cheapest one because she needed a waterproof watch with really big display numbers for her aging eyes)
Forgive me if this is obvious, or if fancier devices than mine can sort it out in more detail, but my issue with cadence tracking is that it’s fairly useless if you do run/walk intervals because it just takes an average of the two. I find an easier and more accurate measure to be counting every other step during an interval and multiplying by 2 to get steps per minute. I just do that every once in a while to see where I’m at. But I’m also not big on data collection lol! (Says she who never saves any run on her Garmin, and mostly bought the cheapest one because she needed a waterproof watch with really big display numbers for her aging eyes)
Um… it’s white… and round… and had a steep discount when I bought it 5 ish years ago?!Which type do you have?
I find it super useful for intervals, especially as I like to do sections of different intervals in the same run. (2:00/:30, 3:00/30 back to 2:00/:30 if keeps me distracted that way for some reason) You can add as many steps per repeat as you want, to get around the 40-repeat limit, or do as @DopeyBadger says and stack them. If you make sure to label each step as run or then recovery for the walk it will also give you your average pace for the run section and walk section separately per repeat if that makes sense. You do have to set up the workouts in the app, but I think you may also be able to do it online as well. I have always wondered why they chose 40 as the limit.Um… it’s white… and round… and had a steep discount when I bought it 5 ish years ago?!I have no idea! I don’t even use it for intervals, just keeping time and to have a back up if my iSmoothRun phone app dies mid-run. I don’t even have the Garmin app installed lol!
This was my problem prior to Apple updating their activity app. Now it has intervals built in instead of third party and breaks down the details of cadence while walking and running for each individual interval. Happier now especially since I only use intervals about 10 percent of the time training and on long ‘A’ races. I’m sure Garmin or others do something better but I really like my Apple bubble.Forgive me if this is obvious, or if fancier devices than mine can sort it out in more detail, but my issue with cadence tracking is that it’s fairly useless if you do run/walk intervals because it just takes an average of the two. I find an easier and more accurate measure to be counting every other step during an interval and multiplying by 2 to get steps per minute. I just do that every once in a while to see where I’m at. But I’m also not big on data collection lol! (Says she who never saves any run on her Garmin, and mostly bought the cheapest one because she needed a waterproof watch with really big display numbers for her aging eyes)
Forgive me if this is obvious, or if fancier devices than mine can sort it out in more detail, but my issue with cadence tracking is that it’s fairly useless if you do run/walk intervals because it just takes an average of the two. I find an easier and more accurate measure to be counting every other step during an interval and multiplying by 2 to get steps per minute. I just do that every once in a while to see where I’m at. But I’m also not big on data collection lol! (Says she who never saves any run on her Garmin, and mostly bought the cheapest one because she needed a waterproof watch with really big display numbers for her aging eyes)
Golf clap from me on your answer.Forgive me if this is obvious, or if fancier devices than mine can sort it out in more detail, but my issue with cadence tracking is that it’s fairly useless if you do run/walk intervals because it just takes an average of the two. I find an easier and more accurate measure to be counting every other step during an interval and multiplying by 2 to get steps per minute. I just do that every once in a while to see where I’m at. But I’m also not big on data collection lol! (Says she who never saves any run on her Garmin, and mostly bought the cheapest one because she needed a waterproof watch with really big display numbers for her aging eyes)
We have it narrowed down to one of three choices: Venice, Montpellier, or Nice