MickeyisBeast
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2009
- Messages
- 37,536
Cont'd
3. Hypocrisy, Hypocrisy, Hypocrisy... and Played Out Arguments
Ever hear of a Red Sox fan accusing the Yankees of buying a championship? Dumb question. Played out and hypocritical. I guess that the first team to win the World Series with a 100,000,000 payroll didn't buy their championship. Boston fan would argue that it was their great farm system that brought it home. Exactly how many home grown players played a major role in your 2004 World Series victory? One, Trot Nixon. Your 2007 World Series Victory? Five. When the Yankees went 4-for-6 in World Series victories, they had five core homegrown players (four of them still remain and were on the team in 2009). In addition to being hypocrites, I guess you're also incapable of basic math (5>1, 5=5).
Incapable of basic math you say? On a daily basis, I hear or see an argument of the number of championships the Yankees won doesn't matter, it's the quality. I guess that's as clever as "Shove your 26 rings up your ***, talk to me when you've won this century" was. Check, now that 27 is here, I'm talking to you and there's one simple mathematical equation you need to understand 27>7. For that matter 10>7 (St. Louis Cardinals) and 9>7 (Athletics franchise in its various cities). Until you pass one of those franchises, you have no right to even start comparing yourself to the Yankees. Just talk to a Lakers fan who tries to argue that their franchise is now the elite NBA franchise. What's that? I think it was a Boston Fan pointing out the 17 banners that fly from their rafters... and no mention of the 20-plus years in between championships. And, in case you didn't know, KG and Ray Allen were "homegrown". Sorry Boston, you can't have it both ways. If you want to say the Red Sox franchise is better than the Yankees franchise, you have to kiss Lakers' fans feet and crown them NBA elite. Either way, the Lakers and the Yankees are defending champs.
3. Hypocrisy, Hypocrisy, Hypocrisy... and Played Out Arguments
Ever hear of a Red Sox fan accusing the Yankees of buying a championship? Dumb question. Played out and hypocritical. I guess that the first team to win the World Series with a 100,000,000 payroll didn't buy their championship. Boston fan would argue that it was their great farm system that brought it home. Exactly how many home grown players played a major role in your 2004 World Series victory? One, Trot Nixon. Your 2007 World Series Victory? Five. When the Yankees went 4-for-6 in World Series victories, they had five core homegrown players (four of them still remain and were on the team in 2009). In addition to being hypocrites, I guess you're also incapable of basic math (5>1, 5=5).
Incapable of basic math you say? On a daily basis, I hear or see an argument of the number of championships the Yankees won doesn't matter, it's the quality. I guess that's as clever as "Shove your 26 rings up your ***, talk to me when you've won this century" was. Check, now that 27 is here, I'm talking to you and there's one simple mathematical equation you need to understand 27>7. For that matter 10>7 (St. Louis Cardinals) and 9>7 (Athletics franchise in its various cities). Until you pass one of those franchises, you have no right to even start comparing yourself to the Yankees. Just talk to a Lakers fan who tries to argue that their franchise is now the elite NBA franchise. What's that? I think it was a Boston Fan pointing out the 17 banners that fly from their rafters... and no mention of the 20-plus years in between championships. And, in case you didn't know, KG and Ray Allen were "homegrown". Sorry Boston, you can't have it both ways. If you want to say the Red Sox franchise is better than the Yankees franchise, you have to kiss Lakers' fans feet and crown them NBA elite. Either way, the Lakers and the Yankees are defending champs.