I have read numerous threads on the DIS that sparked an emotional response from me. I always choose to just let it go, knowing that most times, no good can come from responding. But this one has touched a nerve....
To the OP, I'm so very sorry for the way you were treated. It amazes me how the lack of tolerance and sensitivity of one person can create a miserable situation. How difficult would it have been for that CM to show a small amount of understanding and tolerance? And what a difference it would have made for your daughter.
In response to some of the other comments...
I'm brought back to Sociology 101 and the archaic theory of the "worthy poor". As I understand it, the issue is who should be permitted to use the wheelchair accessable doors, in what order they should be allowed to use them, and who should make the decision. Let me clearly state my opinion, ANYONE whose mobility is limited by the size and accessability of the "regular" doors should be permitted equal access to the monorail by using the wheelchair accessable doors. Who are we to sit back and analyze anyone's personal situation to determine their "worthiness"?
When I was treated for cervical cancer, I was at times, very uncomfortable and often fatigued. Had I been wearing a sign indicating my condition for all the world to see, would I have been deemed worthy enough to use the elevator rather than the stairs? My disability was "cured in 10 months". During this time I had 5 month old twins and a 2.5 year old. I always had to use a double stroller that would commonly only fit through a wheelchair accessable door. And, NO, it was not physically possible to hold two infants and the hand of my two year old while folding it up. Frankly, at times, I did not possess the strength to tip it up, while pushing, and holding my two year olds hand. Even with all my strength, that was sometimes very difficult.
So folks, how do we order the line? Those in a wheelchair since birth to the front? Followed by those confined to a wheelchair for other reasons? What about those who only have to use a chair for long distances? Should they get out of the chair, fold it up and board elsewhere? What about the parent with the triple stroller? They should only be allowed to board if both parents are available to hold babies and fold up a stroller? What about the mother with the double stroller, a toddler and cancer slowing her down just trying to enjoy what may be her only chance to bring her kids to Disney? Perhaps we should require a questionaire at the entrance where you can plead your case as to why the wider doors are neccessary for you to board.
Oh, and then we need to address who may board with the person with the need. No one may be accompanied by more than one other person. Hmmm, but that leaves my second child down the monorail alone. Okay, how about, no one may be accompanied by more than other adult? But then that leaves.... you can see where this is going.
The bottom line, as far as I'm concerned, is that the wider doors are there to allow people who must have the wider doors to use them. And I, the casual observer, can never be the one to judge. I know that as long as there is some convinience in using them, someone with take advantage. That's an unfortunate reality. As long as I am standing in the line with "regular" doors, I'll be thankful I can use them. And when I look down the line and see people in the "wheelchair" line, I'll remember that not everything is as it seems to the casual observer.