The Implosion of John Kerry?

[louie694]

Originally posted by Samsara
Since when did quoting republican smear sites become "substantive"?

Vote for kerry. please. it's very important. we need a regime change. and don't consider using any smear sites like those nasty, attack republicans. let's stick to unimpeachable (ooops, sorry about the pun) sources, you know, like al franken, or michael moore, or barbara streisand, or even howard stearn. i mean between every visit from hookers and dancers, howard often talks about core democratic values. and no, i never watch howard. he is offensive. and now that i think about it, kerry will get away with lying about his war record even though that's all he ever talks about. because kerry isn't bush. and that's why we need to vote for him.

 

[Nancy]

Originally posted by Missy1961
Answer this: are you better off then you were 4 years ago?

Most of us aren't.

Actually YES I am...but not due to what any politician has done for me...but because of the hard work my husband and I have done to make us this way.

 

[minniepumpernickel]

Originally posted by louie694
Vote for kerry. please. it's very important. we need a regime change. and don't consider using any smear sites like those nasty, attack republicans. let's stick to unimpeachable (ooops, sorry about the pun) sources, you know, like al franken, or michael moore, or barbara streisand, or even howard stearn. i mean between every visit from hookers and dancers, howard often talks about core democratic values. and no, i never watch howard. he is offensive. and now that i think about it, kerry will get away with lying about his war record even though that's all he ever talks about. because kerry isn't bush. and that's why we need to vote for him.

Well, if you don't watch Howard's show how do you know about the hookers and dancers?

 

[ThAnswr]

Originally posted by Teejay32
Regnery Publishing has a thing for conservative political writers. But I think you could find the reverse is true for other publishers.

I wouldn't describe Regnery Publishing as having a thing for conservative political writers.

I'd describe Regnery Publishing as have a thing for the extreme rightwing-nut element of nut job politics. Although the book about the wisdom of Denny Hastert has me intrigued.

Regardless, whenever something eminates from the fringes, I suspect I'm getting less of the truth and more of an agenda.

Originally posted by Teejay32
I wonder how a poster registered in July would be familiar with DawnCt's posting style.

Remember, you don't have to be registered to read these boards. A person could be lurking for years before they decide to post in which case they would have to register.

 

[Teejay32]

Originally posted by ThAnswr
I wouldn't describe Regnery Publishing as having a thing for conservative political writers.

I'd describe Regnery Publishing as have a thing for the extreme rightwing-nut element of nut job politics.

Hah! So there is a difference.

 

[gometros]

Originally posted by shrubber
Wait a minute ..The President of the United States is responsible for IT jobs being outsourced?
Really gometros.
It is the goverments responsibility to make sure that outdated job skills ( and jobs ) are protected?

DO you even have a clue to what I meant? The point was that IT folks ween't out of work because of limited skills, but because of jobs going off shore. And really, I do blame the President for letting that happen. If not, who do I blame? You?

 

[gometros]

Originally posted by ThAnswr
Btw, louie, welcome to the new hangout for the displaced Debate Board warriors. It gets lively, and sometimes downright mean, but it's always interesting.

Now all anyone has to do is to teach louie how to debate instead of posting cute and amuzing nonsense.

 

[treesinger]

Originally posted by gometros
DO you even have a clue to what I meant? The point was that IT folks ween't out of work because of limited skills, but because of jobs going off shore. And really, I do blame the President for letting that happen. If not, who do I blame? You?

How 'bout blaming the companies that want to squeeze every last penny of profit they can.

 

[gometros]

Originally posted by treesinger
How 'bout blaming the companies that want to squeeze every last penny of profit they can.

Or how about blaming a government that refuses to place limits on H1-B and L-1 visas? How about a governemtn that hould be telling those companies that if they move their business off-shore they won't be eligible to do business with government agencies?

 

[louie694]

Originally posted by treesinger
How 'bout blaming the companies that want to squeeze every last penny of profit they can.

Isn't that the basis of capitalism? Why would you blame companies for making profits? Isn't that why people buy stock? Would you buy stock in a company that didn't make profit?

 

[ThAnswr]

Originally posted by Teejay32
Hah! So there is a difference.

Double Hah! Hah, hah! Infinitesimal as it is, yes, there is a difference.

 

[ThAnswr]

Originally posted by treesinger
How 'bout blaming the companies that want to squeeze every last penny of profit they can.

The president sets the tone. When the foreign car makers wanted to export more cars here, Ronald Reagan insisted they build plants here first.