The FINAL (?!) Jodi Arias thread (Penalty Phase retrial verdict)

[usnuzuloose]

Anderson: getting as far as gun in the face is indirect threat if someone else did the shooting the gun in the face is enough #Hernandez

 

[usnuzuloose]

Locke: then why did we hear all this evidence about a shooting #AaronHernandez

 

[usnuzuloose]

a: Locke: we have no evidence to support #AaronHernandez passed gun to another person after pointing it at AB "that would be rank speculation"

Locke: evidence cannot support indirect harm through another person #AaronHernandez

 

[usnuzuloose]

Anderson: u can support indirect w/Bradley text that he doesn't know who shot him #AaronHernandez


Anderson: SJC previously broadened witness intimidation statute #AaronHernandez

 

[usnuzuloose]

Cathy@courtchatter
29s
#AaronHernandez - CW suggesting someone else could have pulled the trigger in Bradley shooting.

 

[usnuzuloose]

Locke: 2 say u could find #AaronHernandez guilty just for pointing gun may be correct "but it's not the evidence" #AaronHernandez

 

[usnuzuloose]

na: Cathy@courtchatter
19s
#AaronHernandez - Locke is not buying what the Commonwealth is trying to sell.

Locke: u must find beyond reasonable doubt that #AaronHernandez shot Bradley that will be response to jury

 

[usnuzuloose]

Cathy@courtchatter
16s
#AaronHernandez - Locke to prosecution: Your theory has always been AH shot AB.

 

[usnuzuloose]

Cathy@courtchatter
16s
#AaronHernandez - Locke to prosecution: Your theory has always been AH shot AB

 

[usnuzuloose]

a: Locke: u must find beyond reasonable doubt that #AaronHernandez shot Bradley that will be response to jury

 

[usnuzuloose]

: Cathy@courtchatter
now
#AaronHernandez - Judge Locke will answer the jury ? : No, you cannot find him guilty for indirect conduct in AB shootin

 

[usnuzuloose]

: Travis Andersen @TAGlobe
35s
Locke to jury: #AaronHernandez can't be found guilty if found he indirectly injured Bradley--evidence in this case was direct harm/threat

 

[usnuzuloose]

Locke: construe evidence to indirect "would be to engage in speculation--there's no evidence that anyone else committed that shooting or pointed the weapon. #AaronHernandez

 

[usnuzuloose]

Locke: CW must satisfy u beyond reasonable doubt that #AaronHernandez shot Bradley

 

[usnuzuloose]

Cathy@courtchatter
now
#AaronHernandez - The jury is now deliberating.

 

[usnuzuloose]

Sullivan: not suggesting that was the court's intent but that's how it came out Locke: bring the jury back down. #AaronHernandez

 

[usnuzuloose]

: Defense says judge told jury that the only evidence is that Hernandez shot Bradley, making it sound like an affirmative claim

: Cathy@courtchatter
9s
#AaronHernandez - Now there's a problem with how the judge answered the jury question.

 

[usnuzuloose]

Cathy @courtchatter
now
#AaronHernandez - The judge is having the jury brought back in.
#AaronHernandez Judge to jury: In context of this case, ...(pros) must satisfy you behind a reason'ble doubt that mr ah shot mr bradley"

 

[usnuzuloose]

: Locke to jury: instruct I just gave u it could be construed I was expressing a view abt the evidence # Locke: i did not mean to suggest that as a fact in any way .... theory in case is that #AaronHernandez shot Bradley so CW must prove that

 

[usnuzuloose]

Cathy@courtchatter
now
#AaronHernandez - Judge Locke tells the jury he didn't mean to imply that HE believes AH shot AB, that's up to them to decide.