Marcella, though...I don't think she could cut it as an "executive." Isn't that what the position is for?
I disagree. Macella is operating in an artificial environment. One in which people can ignore her, sabatoge her, play games, etc. In a REAL working environment at MS, she wouldn't have to put up with all that. She is bright, gets along very well with people, and knows about food.
Being a manager myself, I know it's important to get along with many groups of people. Those who report to you, other "equal" managers, company executives, customers, vendors, etc. Someome like Jim is entertaining, but I would never hire him as an apprentice. It would only be a matter of time before he offended someone. Jim is very good at playing the game, but in the end MS will pick someone who can actually run a team within the company. That's not Jim. I agree the only other real candidate is that other woman who worked with Marcella on the last task.
I've noticed that both MS and Trump are on the lookout for candidates who are deliberately "tanking" a task to make the PM look bad. It's about time! I've always felt like the PM gets too much of the blame for failing a task. Because again, the PM is an artificial "manager." Normally employees would work hard for the manager, kiss up, work extra hard to prve themselves, etc.
On both Apprentice shows, some candidates don't work hard, aren't real bright or creative, or try to take the PM down. Then the PM is accused of not having control of the team. Well of course they don't have control!
One other thing I notice throughout all these shows. The supposedly "professional" women are mostly catty and don't remotely act like a business professional. It's like "I'm a woman hear me roar" only 40 years too late. Again, it's both shows. If any of the women who work for me would act like that within the team, they wouldn't be around for long.