testing an idea

[SueM in MN]

What do you think?
Are the images big enough? Clear enough?

 

[daisyduck123]

They look good to me!!

 

[aPiratesLife4Me]

I agree, they look good!

 

[SueM in MN]

Thanks for the feedback.
I'm having a problem with uploading and I was not sure it would even be visible since it is not showing up on the DIS Photo gallery. I think it is in some "picture Limbo" and I was able to copy it here temporarily.

 

[Cheshire Figment]

They look good. They definitely show the detail.

 

[SueM in MN]

They look good. They definitely show the detail.

Thanks.
Now I just have to figure out my technical problem with putting it on the photo site.

 

[SueM in MN]

Trying this

 

[OneLittleSpark]

The link works for me.

 

[SueM in MN]

I was trying to post the image, not the link.
This one is LARGE

This one is MEDIUM

Is the large too large?
Is the medium big enough?

 

[OneLittleSpark]

On my screen the large looks the best, but the medium is clear enough to get all the necessary details on, and might work better for smaller screens.

 

[SueM in MN]

On my screen the large looks the best, but the medium is clear enough to get all the necessary details on, and might work better for smaller screens.

Thanks.
I'm thinking the smaller one might work better for a number of reasons; less bandwidth, less time loading and if I use these for my Epcot FAQs thread, it won't be quite so big.

 

[goofieslonglostsis]

Both I can see, but the medium one would be a bit hard to do if I hadn't been to WDW before and know a bit what I'll be looking for.

If you're worried about bandwidth etc. maybe it's an idea to make a topic with links in there for both the larger and medium one, so people can pick what they think is best? Or are you also worried about the space you've got to upload them to?

 

[SueM in MN]

Both I can see, but the medium one would be a bit hard to do if I hadn't been to WDW before and know a bit what I'll be looking for.

If you're worried about bandwidth etc. maybe it's an idea to make a topic with links in there for both the larger and medium one, so people can pick what they think is best? Or are you also worried about the space you've got to upload them to?

Thanks for the feedback.
I think a little of both.
If you look at this thread, my first thought was to just have a write up about each attraction. I was going to have one post about World Showcase and one about Future World. I was going to post full size pictures, but those would be too big and take up too much space on a page to read about it and look at the picture at the same time.
I decided to make picture montages like this and my idea is to post one for as many attractions as I can, along with some written information. I could post the smaller ones and include a link to the larger size. That way, if someone wanted to print out just the pictures and add their own notes, they could.
I also have to decide if I should group the attractions or have one post for each attraction/pavilion.

 

[Cheshire Figment]

I think the large is much easier to see and make out the details. And as WM Alex says, don't worry about bandwidth as most people now have broadband; those who don't probably have images turned off anyway.

 

[Talking Hands]

Larger is clearer for me.

 

[SueM in MN]

Thanks to all.
Large it is.
When I finally get around to putting these up, I will include a link to the picture so that people can print one off if they want.

 

[MarieS]

Great idea Sue! The large looks best to me. I think the pictures will be a big help to people.

 

[mechurchlady]

Great idea as it is much easier to see the ride vehicle and a person actually being loaded. What is easy for some is hard for others. Sheer Genius.

 

[HappyCamperToo]

Thanks to all.
Large it is.
When I finally get around to putting these up, I will include a link to the picture so that people can print one off if they want.

I use Internet Explorer, and there's a drop down "menu" I guess you'd call it which usually says 100% right above the clock in the lower right corner, but can zoom the screen up to 400%, making it perfectly easy to see all the detail in the smaller version of your picture. I'm guessing most browsers have a similar feature, so if the larger image doesn't work out because of too much space, etc., you might be able to use the smaller and add a note or something about adjusting the zoom level.

 

[mechurchlady]

On the drop down menu of the new IE is the custom which allows custom settings such as reducing to 10% or blowing up something to 1000% but on close ups it is rather hard to find the thing I am looking for.