A year or so ago we took a family trip to wdw and sponsored bil, sil and our niece and nephew at SOG. some of you may remember the debate that stemmed from bil buying his 17 yr.old son beer. dh went back to the room and dumped it when he realized that ds and dn were probably drinking. flash forward 14 months later. DN is away at college, where according to his mother he is drinking so much beer that he is "gettin fat". during the summer, he has passed out a couple of times, woke up naked on the deck, so now he has learned "his lesson" and doesn't drink hard liquor. 16 year old niece, good student, a nice girl has now started partying. last weekend when her parentys were out. she had "another" party. apparently she has had afew and has gotton a verbal chastising equivalent to a "time out'. during this last party, someone fell through the wall making abig hole but worse than that, one girl was so drunk she fell down the stairs and BROKE HER ARM. SIL realizes that she is lucky that she knows the parents and they aren't "likely to sue". in fact the father of the girl came out and said as much. she just sighed and said, " i don't know what to do with her'. i said that she wouldn't drive for at least a month" to which she replied; "its basketball season and it will be a big inconvenience to me". they live within 3 miles of the school. she could walk or ride a bike.
my feeling is, taking an approach of 'moderate teen age drinking, rather than the zero tilerance approach hasn't made her undeerage drinkers responsible. what do you think?
my feeling is, taking an approach of 'moderate teen age drinking, rather than the zero tilerance approach hasn't made her undeerage drinkers responsible. what do you think?
My in-laws looked the other way with my SIL's teenaged drinking and drugging. They didn't do her any favors.
