OK-I just need to jump in and ask a question for the Natalie supporters: Mick played the same game as Natalie (riding along on Russell's coattails), and he actually WON a competition (Natalie never won anything), and came very close to winning quite a few. Why didn't he deserve to win over Natalie? Most of you think Natalie deserved to win, but considering she never won a competition I would say Mick was more deserving than her. I was really shocked that Mick didn't get one vote.
Personally I think Russell was robbed. Usually the juries look past most of the personal stuff and try to vote for the best player (Evil Dick winning BB is the best example of that, even though I HATED him!). I am still shocked.